These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22335308)

  • 21. Indication and outcome of forceps deliveries in Lagos: a study of 553 cases.
    Giwa-Osagie OF; Ogunyemi DO; Ogedengbe BK
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Mar; 13(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 3593085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Vaginal delivery with the Colombian forceps].
    Fossen D
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1982 Mar; 102(8):497-9. PubMed ID: 7157311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An audit of forceps delivery in Trinidad.
    Roopnarinesingh A; Knowles R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12521496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In praise of Kielland's forceps.
    Vacca A
    BJOG; 2002 Dec; 109(12):1417. PubMed ID: 12504987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maternal and neonatal effects of outlet forceps delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies.
    Tulsky AS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 79(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 1731306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery.
    Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Strachan B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 May; 156(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 21277670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Occurrence and predictors of vacuum and forceps used sequentially for vaginal birth.
    Xie RH; Cao H; Hong B; Sprague AE; Walker M; Wu Wen S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Apr; 35(4):317-322. PubMed ID: 23660038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Report on 7000 deliveries in a medium-sized hospital with consideration of the process of labor in foreigners].
    Loew D; Schrank P
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1966 Jan; 88(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 5974477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mid forceps delivery with uterine rupture (inadvertent hysterotomy?).
    MacElin TW; Claypool DR
    IMJ Ill Med J; 1975 Jun; 147(6):542. PubMed ID: 237813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maternal and neonatal effects of outlet forceps delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies.
    Yancey MK; Herpolsheimer A; Jordan GD; Benson WL; Brady K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 78(4):646-50. PubMed ID: 1923169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [SPECULUM DELIVERY AND VACUUM EXTRACTION IN CLASSICAL OBSTETRICS].
    WILLE P
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1964 Aug; 86():1065-81. PubMed ID: 14249747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neonatal acid-base balance in spontaneous and instrumental vaginal deliveries.
    Livnat EJ; Fejgin M; Scommegna A; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov; 52(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 31586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [INDICATIONS FOR SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS WHEN FORCEPS AND VACUUM EXTRACTOR ARE AVAILABLE].
    DOEMOETOERI J; CSOEMOER S; TREIT S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1965 Mar; 87():332-7. PubMed ID: 14288865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of obstetrical procedures in the care of low-risk women.
    Adams JL
    Women Health; 1983; 8(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 6868624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Termination of delivery in pathologic labour activity].
    Pontuch A; Chabada J; Sutta I; Pohlová G
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1976 Jul; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 974840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. LOCKED TWINS.
    GERMAN LJ; TAYLOR E
    J Int Coll Surg; 1965 Feb; 43():155-8. PubMed ID: 14226381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.
    Simic M; Cnattingius S; Petersson G; Sandström A; Stephansson O
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Feb; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28222704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Cephalic presentation and use of the branch of the Kjelland forceps].
    Mery A; Iglesias J; Varela J; Figueroa JP
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1967; 32(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 5598494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.