BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22335527)

  • 1. Using the Tukey-Kramer omnibus test in the Hayter-Fisher procedure.
    Richter SJ; McCann MH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 22335527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):115-31. PubMed ID: 18482478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An improved uniformly more powerful exact Fisher-Hayter pairwise comparisons procedure.
    Wang B; Cui X
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):767-775. PubMed ID: 28436123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: a simulation study.
    Cui Y; Li J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 22295951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
    Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalized F test and generalized deviance test in two-way ANOVA models for randomized trials.
    Shen J; He X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):523-34. PubMed ID: 24697334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design.
    Liu JP; Fan HY; Ma MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):889-901. PubMed ID: 16279349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation for simulation-based multiple-testing procedures.
    Bang H; Jung SH; George SL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):957-67. PubMed ID: 16279354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.
    Lee Y; Shao J; Chow SC; Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):503-34. PubMed ID: 12477072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinded sample size recalculation in multicentre trials with normally distributed outcome.
    Jensen K; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):377-99. PubMed ID: 20394080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of statistical power for confidence intervals.
    Liu XS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 22026811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.