These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2233577)

  • 1. Model of the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):894-904. PubMed ID: 2233577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of various noise sources on the detective quantum efficiency of phosphor screens.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):887-93. PubMed ID: 2233576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of finite phosphor thickness on detective quantum efficiency.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Holmes RB
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(5):773-80. PubMed ID: 2811759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quantum accounting and detective quantum efficiency analysis for video-based portal imaging.
    Bissonnette JP; Cunningham IA; Jaffray DA; Fenster A; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):815-26. PubMed ID: 9198014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems.
    Cunningham IA; Westmore MS; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 8208217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 7935207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions.
    Jee KW; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1874-90. PubMed ID: 12906206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo study on the imaging performance of powder Lu2SiO5:Ce phosphor screens under x-ray excitation: comparison with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1724-33. PubMed ID: 17555254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detective quantum efficiency of x-ray image intensifiers: comparison of scintillation spectrum and rms methods.
    Rowlands JA; Taylor KW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 6503873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the information content of phosphor produced medical images: application to Zn2SiO4:Mn phosphor.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS; Fezoulidis I
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2000 Jan; 52(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 10670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical factors affecting the detective quantum efficiency of radiographic screens.
    Drangova M; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 3702809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling granular phosphor screens by Monte Carlo methods.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4502-14. PubMed ID: 17278802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of characteristic x rays on the noise power spectra and detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray detectors.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2039-49. PubMed ID: 11695766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.