223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22335836)
1. A simple method for estimating relative risk using logistic regression.
Diaz-Quijano FA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Feb; 12():14. PubMed ID: 22335836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What's the relative risk? A method to directly estimate risk ratios in cohort studies of common outcomes.
Robbins AS; Chao SY; Fonseca VP
Ann Epidemiol; 2002 Oct; 12(7):452-4. PubMed ID: 12377421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies.
Coutinho LM; Scazufca M; Menezes PR
Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 42(6):992-8. PubMed ID: 19009156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of relative risk and prevalence ratio.
Savu A; Liu Q; Yasui Y
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(22):2269-81. PubMed ID: 20564738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes.
Lee J; Tan CS; Chia KS
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2009 Aug; 38(8):714-9. PubMed ID: 19736577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.
Localio AR; Margolis DJ; Berlin JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 17689803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias of using odds ratio estimates in multinomial logistic regressions to estimate relative risk or prevalence ratio and alternatives.
Camey SA; Torman VB; Hirakata VN; Cortes RX; Vigo A
Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jan; 30(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24627010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating risk ratio from any standard epidemiological design by doubling the cases.
Ning Y; Lam A; Reilly M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):157. PubMed ID: 35637431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negative log-binomial model with optimal robust variance to estimate the prevalence ratio, in cross-sectional population studies.
Ibáñez-Pinilla M; Villalba-Niño S; Olaya-Galán NN
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):219. PubMed ID: 37794385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Odds Ratio or Prevalence Ratio? An Overview of Reported Statistical Methods and Appropriateness of Interpretations in Cross-sectional Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes in Veterinary Medicine.
Martinez BAF; Leotti VB; Silva GSE; Nunes LN; Machado G; Corbellini LG
Front Vet Sci; 2017; 4():193. PubMed ID: 29177157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Selection of statistical methods for estimating the association between exposure factors and rare outcomes based on cohort studies].
Liu XH; Wang C; Yan RH; Peng XX; Yin CH
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 44(7):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 37482717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the Source of a Disease Outbreak Based on Risk Estimation: A Simulation Study Comparing Risk Estimates Obtained From Logistic and Poisson Regression Applied to a Dichotomous Outcome.
Rojanaworarit C; Wong JJ
Ochsner J; 2019; 19(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31528132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating the incidence rate ratio in cross-sectional studies using a simple alternative to logistic regression.
Martuzzi M; Elliott P
Ann Epidemiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9465994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.
Barros AJ; Hirakata VN
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Oct; 3():21. PubMed ID: 14567763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital-level associations with 30-day patient mortality after cardiac surgery: a tutorial on the application and interpretation of marginal and multilevel logistic regression.
Sanagou M; Wolfe R; Forbes A; Reid CM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Mar; 12():28. PubMed ID: 22409732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased efficiency of analyses: cumulative logistic regression vs ordinary logistic regression.
Taylor GW; Becker MP
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9511834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential misinterpretation of treatment effects due to use of odds ratios and logistic regression in randomized controlled trials.
Knol MJ; Duijnhoven RG; Grobbee DE; Moons KG; Groenwold RH
PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21248. PubMed ID: 21698176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Down with odds ratios: risk ratios in cohort studies and randomised clinical trials].
Knol MJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(28):A4775. PubMed ID: 22805792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.
Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher.
Gallis JA; Turner EL
Ann Glob Health; 2019 Nov; 85(1):137. PubMed ID: 31807416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
