BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2233584)

  • 1. Problems with the Radiation Measurements Incorporated/American College of Radiology mammography accreditation phantom.
    Nikesch W
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):934. PubMed ID: 2233584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. American College of Radiology mammography accreditation guidelines.
    Wilcox PA
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1991 Apr; 5(4):19. PubMed ID: 1831035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American College of Radiology (ACR). Mammography Accreditation Program: Guidelines.
    Wilcox PA
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1991; 72(1):17. PubMed ID: 2011816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    McLelland R; Hendrick RE; Zinninger MD; Wilcox PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Sep; 157(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 1872231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images.
    Chakraborty DP; Eckert MP
    Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 7565344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control in mammography: The American College of Radiology's Mammography Screening Accreditation Program.
    Hendrick RE
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1989 Aug; 1(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2641483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Bassett LW; Farria DM; Bansal S; Farquhar MA; Wilcox PA; Feig SA
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10831687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology.
    Haus A
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography accreditation and equipment performance.
    Barnes GT; Hendrick RE
    Radiographics; 1994 Jan; 14(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 8128045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
    Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective evaluations of mammographic accreditation phantom images by three observer groups.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8144336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Meyer P; Zinninger M; Wilcox P
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):27-8, 30, 33-6. PubMed ID: 10106046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ; Lawton DT
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):709-23. PubMed ID: 9167162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.
    Haus AG; Yaffe MJ; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Butler PA; Wilcox PA; Bansal S
    Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2297-301. PubMed ID: 11764036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inconsistencies in mammographic phantoms used for ACR Accreditation.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):581-3. PubMed ID: 1561375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
    McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national survey.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of mammography quality in Istanbul.
    Gürdemir B; Arıbal E
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 22801869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography quality assurance programs.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):239-43. PubMed ID: 8004593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.