These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2233584)

  • 1. Problems with the Radiation Measurements Incorporated/American College of Radiology mammography accreditation phantom.
    Nikesch W
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):934. PubMed ID: 2233584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. American College of Radiology mammography accreditation guidelines.
    Wilcox PA
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1991 Apr; 5(4):19. PubMed ID: 1831035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American College of Radiology (ACR). Mammography Accreditation Program: Guidelines.
    Wilcox PA
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1991; 72(1):17. PubMed ID: 2011816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    McLelland R; Hendrick RE; Zinninger MD; Wilcox PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Sep; 157(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 1872231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images.
    Chakraborty DP; Eckert MP
    Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 7565344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control in mammography: The American College of Radiology's Mammography Screening Accreditation Program.
    Hendrick RE
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1989 Aug; 1(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2641483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Bassett LW; Farria DM; Bansal S; Farquhar MA; Wilcox PA; Feig SA
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10831687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology.
    Haus A
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography accreditation and equipment performance.
    Barnes GT; Hendrick RE
    Radiographics; 1994 Jan; 14(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 8128045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
    Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective evaluations of mammographic accreditation phantom images by three observer groups.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jan; 29(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 8144336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Meyer P; Zinninger M; Wilcox P
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):27-8, 30, 33-6. PubMed ID: 10106046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ; Lawton DT
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):709-23. PubMed ID: 9167162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between phantom failure rates and radiation dose in mammography accreditation.
    Haus AG; Yaffe MJ; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Butler PA; Wilcox PA; Bansal S
    Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2297-301. PubMed ID: 11764036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inconsistencies in mammographic phantoms used for ACR Accreditation.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):581-3. PubMed ID: 1561375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
    McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national survey.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of mammography quality in Istanbul.
    Gürdemir B; Arıbal E
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2012; 18(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 22801869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography quality assurance programs.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):239-43. PubMed ID: 8004593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.