These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2233584)

  • 41. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM; Dance DR
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    Barlow RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jul; 159(1):219-20. PubMed ID: 1609704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Demographic characteristics of physicists who evaluate mammographic units.
    Rothenberg LN; Deye JA; High MD; Jessop NW; Sternick ES
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 7824712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quality mammography standards. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Direct final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1999 Jun; 64(116):32404-7. PubMed ID: 10558582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The forces behind accreditation.
    Reitherman RW
    Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 1736321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interpretation of mammography screenings.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2017 Jan; (81):1-16. PubMed ID: 28165211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The politics of mammography.
    McLelland R; Pisano ED
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 1732930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Status of residency training in mammography.
    Lubisich JP; Bassett LW; Bresch JA; Jessop NW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1189-91. PubMed ID: 8615267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States.
    Gold RH; Bassett LW; Fox SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1039-46. PubMed ID: 3628751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A phantom for the measurement of contrast detail performance in film-screen mammography.
    Thompson SR; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1049-55. PubMed ID: 1742587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Meaney A; Kaasalainen T; Savolainen S
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):140-148. PubMed ID: 29768928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new phantom for mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Feb; 64(758):116-20. PubMed ID: 2004202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
    Pisano ED; Britt GG; Lin Y; Schell MJ; Burns CB; Brown ME
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Sep; 8(9):864-70. PubMed ID: 11724041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography.
    Paquelet JR; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W115-8. PubMed ID: 20028882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Medicolegal--Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology. In Response to Your Query About Temporary Loss of Mammography Accreditation.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):W639. PubMed ID: 26587953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. First criminal penalty imposed for mammography act violations.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 1999; 33(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10214122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Breast magnetic resonance imaging technique at 1.5 T and 3 T: requirements for quality imaging and American College of Radiology accreditation.
    DeMartini WB; Rahbar H
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2013 Aug; 21(3):475-82. PubMed ID: 23928238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is the Mammography Quality Standards Act worth the cost?
    Dicus GJ; Norton GA; Fincher RL
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):285; author reply 286-8. PubMed ID: 8633165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.