These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22336480)

  • 1. [National exam for the validation of the second medicine cycle in France: What does this examination evaluates?].
    Andrès E; Sananès N; Langer B; Pottecher T
    Presse Med; 2012 Jun; 41(6 Pt 1):e245-9. PubMed ID: 22336480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Educational assessment of the first computerized national ranking exam in France in 2016: Opportunities for improvement].
    Rivière E; Quinton A; Neau D; Constans J; Vignes JR; Dehail P
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 30093106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the discrimination of the final marks after the first computerized national ranking exam in Medicine in June 2016 in France].
    Rivière E; Quinton A; Dehail P
    Rev Med Interne; 2019 May; 40(5):286-290. PubMed ID: 30902508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature on 2009 National Ranking in France].
    Lorette G; Jolly D; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL
    Presse Med; 2010 Jun; 39(6):e118-25. PubMed ID: 20462733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [National ranking exam 2006: advice of a highly ranked student].
    Girard C
    Rev Prat; 2006 Nov; 56(17):1923-4. PubMed ID: 17243394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of the 2012 national ranking in France].
    Jolly D; Lorette G; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Chaffanjon P; Le Jeunne C; Obert L; Rogez JM
    Presse Med; 2013; 42(7-8):1138-40. PubMed ID: 23414810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Logistical regression of success factors in the former internship examination for medical students].
    Thuret G; Brouillet E; Gain P
    Presse Med; 2005 Jun; 34(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 16097377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparability of the national board of medical examiners comprehensive clinical science examination and a set of five clinical science subject examinations.
    Peterson LN; Rusticus SA; Ross LP
    Acad Med; 2015 May; 90(5):684-90. PubMed ID: 25629950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impact of training conferences on medical student's performance for the French National Ranking Examination in Lorraine University. The ETIMCEL experimental study].
    Agrinier N; Bannay A; Santini J; Braun M; Angioi K; Debouverie M; Zuily S;
    Rev Med Interne; 2015 Feb; 36(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 25109445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Results of the 2014 national ranking in France].
    Jolly D; Ambrosi P; Chaffanjon P; Dreyfuss D; Le Jeunne C; Lorette G; Obert L; Palombi O; Romanet JP
    Presse Med; 2015 May; 44(5):533-5. PubMed ID: 25683104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A sampling strategy for promoting and assessing medical student retention of physical examination skills.
    Williams RG; Klamen DL; Mayer D; Valaski M; Roberts NK
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S22-5. PubMed ID: 17895682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience with the objective structured examination as a tool for students' assessment in the Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care in a university [corrected] in Western Saudi Arabia.
    Shawky S
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Feb; 23(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 11938388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College.
    Fallatah HI; Tekian A; Park YS; Al Shawa L
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Feb; 15():10. PubMed ID: 25638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Docimology of the national ranking exam in France: a need to better assess medical students’ reasoning].
    Quinton A; Rivière É
    Rev Prat; 2017 Sep; 67(7):716-718. PubMed ID: 30512762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing medical student competency in communication in the pre-clinical phase: objective structured video exam and SP exam.
    Karabilgin OS; Vatansever K; Caliskan SA; Durak Hİ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 22169634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Faculty and resident evaluations of medical students on a surgery clerkship correlate poorly with standardized exam scores.
    Goldstein SD; Lindeman B; Colbert-Getz J; Arbella T; Dudas R; Lidor A; Sacks B
    Am J Surg; 2014 Feb; 207(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24239528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [2010 National Ranking in France: Results, classifications, consequences of critical appraisal of medical literature].
    Jolly D; Lorette G; Ambrosi P; Dreyfuss D; Magne JL; Kohler C; Duhaut P; Gérard JL; Rogez JM
    Presse Med; 2011 Apr; 40(4 Pt 1):447-8. PubMed ID: 21371854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of methods for dealing with troublesome examination questions.
    Norton JM
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Dec; 271(6 Pt 3):S55-60. PubMed ID: 8997409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of unguided vs guided case-based instruction on the surgery clerkship.
    Adamas-Rappaport WJ; Waer AL; Teeple MK; Benjamin MA; Glazer ES; Sozanski J; Poskus D; Ong E
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(6):821-5. PubMed ID: 24209662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [National ranking exam. Advice from a highly ranked student].
    Sobanski V
    Rev Prat; 2009 Oct; 59(8):1117-8. PubMed ID: 19894455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.