These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22336779)

  • 1. Smart histogram analysis applied to the skull-stripping problem in T1-weighted MRI.
    Balan AG; Traina AJ; Ribeiro MX; Marques PM; Traina C
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 May; 42(5):509-22. PubMed ID: 22336779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skull stripping based on region growing for magnetic resonance brain images.
    Park JG; Lee C
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1394-407. PubMed ID: 19389477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.
    Iglesias JE; Liu CY; Thompson PM; Tu Z
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1617-34. PubMed ID: 21880566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images.
    Galdames FJ; Jaillet F; Perez CA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012; 206(2):103-19. PubMed ID: 22387261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skull-stripping magnetic resonance brain images using a model-based level set.
    Zhuang AH; Valentino DJ; Toga AW
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16697666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MARGA: multispectral adaptive region growing algorithm for brain extraction on axial MRI.
    Roura E; Oliver A; Cabezas M; Vilanova JC; Rovira A; Ramió-Torrentà L; Lladó X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Feb; 113(2):655-73. PubMed ID: 24380649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI.
    Ségonne F; Dale AM; Busa E; Glessner M; Salat D; Hahn HK; Fischl B
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1060-75. PubMed ID: 15219578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skull-stripping method for brain MRI using a 3D level set with a speedup operator.
    Hwang J; Han Y; Park H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Aug; 34(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 21618338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kernel regression based feature extraction for 3D MR image denoising.
    López-Rubio E; Florentín-Núñez MN
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Aug; 15(4):498-513. PubMed ID: 21414834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise measurement from magnitude MRI using local estimates of variance and skewness.
    Rajan J; Poot D; Juntu J; Sijbers J
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):N441-9. PubMed ID: 20679694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing MR image intensity standardization against tissue characterizability of magnetization transfer ratio imaging.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK; Moonis G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 16878312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic brain extraction methods for T1 magnetic resonance images using region labeling and morphological operations.
    Somasundaram K; Kalaiselvi T
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Aug; 41(8):716-25. PubMed ID: 21724183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-view pyramid network for skull stripping on neonatal T1-weighted MRI.
    Gao Y; Li J; Xu H; Wang M; Liu C; Cheng Y; Li M; Yang J; Li X
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():70-79. PubMed ID: 31425808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully automatic brain extraction algorithm for axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.
    Somasundaram K; Kalaiselvi T
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Oct; 40(10):811-22. PubMed ID: 20832783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skull-stripping with machine learning deformable organisms.
    Prasad G; Joshi AA; Feng A; Toga AW; Thompson PM; Terzopoulos D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Oct; 236():114-24. PubMed ID: 25124851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient MR image reconstruction for compressed MR imaging.
    Huang J; Zhang S; Metaxas D
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Oct; 15(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 21742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust Rician noise estimation for MR images.
    Coupé P; Manjón JV; Gedamu E; Arnold D; Robles M; Collins DL
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Aug; 14(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 20417148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A curvelet-based patient-specific prior for accurate multi-modal brain image rigid registration.
    Freiman M; Werman M; Joskowicz L
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 20951076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum likelihood estimation-based denoising of magnetic resonance images using restricted local neighborhoods.
    Rajan J; Jeurissen B; Verhoye M; Van Audekerke J; Sijbers J
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5221-34. PubMed ID: 21791732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic estimation of the noise variance from the histogram of a magnetic resonance image.
    Sijbers J; Poot D; den Dekker AJ; Pintjens W
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1335-48. PubMed ID: 17301458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.