These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
558 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22336855)
1. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Liu H; Lu D; Wang L; Shi G; Song H; Clarke J Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD008978. PubMed ID: 22336855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Liu H; Lawrie TA; Lu D; Song H; Wang L; Shi G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Dec; 2014(12):CD011422. PubMed ID: 25493418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Lawrie TA; Liu H; Lu D; Dowswell T; Song H; Wang L; Shi G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 4(4):CD011422. PubMed ID: 30985921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jan; (1):CD003677. PubMed ID: 15674911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD003677. PubMed ID: 16625589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer. Lu D; Liu Z; Shi G; Liu D; Zhou X Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jan; 1():CD008640. PubMed ID: 22258988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. WITHDRAWN: Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Liu H; Lu D; Shi G; Song H; Wang L Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014; 2014(12):CD008978. PubMed ID: 25502433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V; J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Baekelandt J; De Mulder PA; Le Roy I; Mathieu C; Laenen A; Enzlin P; Weyers S; Mol BW; Bosteels JJ Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():6-15. PubMed ID: 27880893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Reza M; Maeso S; Blasco JA; Andradas E Br J Surg; 2010 Dec; 97(12):1772-83. PubMed ID: 20949554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pentoxifylline versus medical therapies for subfertile women with endometriosis. Lv D; Song H; Li Y; Clarke J; Shi G Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD007677. PubMed ID: 19588441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]