117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22338537)
1. [Leukemias and nuclear energy: mystery and lies].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Jan; 8(325):244-5. PubMed ID: 22338537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do not phase out nuclear power - yet.
Ferguson CD
Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7339):411. PubMed ID: 21430730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Incidence of acute leukemias, lymphomas and thyroid cancers in children under 15 years, living around the Marcoule nuclear site from 1985 to 1995].
Bouges S; Daurès JP; Hébrard M
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Jun; 47(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 10422115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nuclear energy: Nationalize the Fukushima Daiichi atomic plant.
Taira T; Hatoyama Y
Nature; 2011 Dec; 480(7377):313-4. PubMed ID: 22170662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Japan faces power struggle.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7342):143-4. PubMed ID: 21490642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiological effluents released by U.S. commercial nuclear power plants from 1995-2005.
Harris JT; Miller DW
Health Phys; 2008 Dec; 95(6):734-43. PubMed ID: 19001900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nuclear safety: Reactors, residents and risk.
Butler D
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):400-1. PubMed ID: 21525903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Infant leukaemia after the Chernobyl accident.
Michaelis J; Kaletsch U; Burkart W; Grosche B
Nature; 1997 May; 387(6630):246. PubMed ID: 9153387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety shambles.
Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7411):253. PubMed ID: 22895296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation example and cancer: the Japanese example.
Goozner M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Dec; 103(23):1736. PubMed ID: 22100585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Leukaemia sleuths accuse state of nuclear cover-up.
Simm B
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):134. PubMed ID: 15538326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quake shuts world's largest nuclear plant.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):392-3. PubMed ID: 17653149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nuclear safety lies in greater transparency.
Wang Q
Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7438):403. PubMed ID: 23446380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A long shadow over Fukushima.
Smith J
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7341):7. PubMed ID: 21475152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: BAKER P.J. & HOEL D.G. (2007) European Journal of Cancer Care16, 355-363. Meta-analysis of standardized incidence and mortality rates of childhood leukaemia in proximity to nuclear facilities.
Spix C; Blettner M
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Jul; 18(4):429-30. PubMed ID: 19594613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Concerns over nuclear energy are legitimate.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):549. PubMed ID: 21455133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fukushima impact is still hazy.
Cyranoski D; Brumfiel G
Nature; 2011 Sep; 477(7363):139-40. PubMed ID: 21900984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fuel and waste no bar to US nuclear growth.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):376-7. PubMed ID: 20864965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Chernobyl, Fukushima, and beyond: a health safety perspective.
Sarin R
J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 21768693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting material release during a nuclear reactor accident.
Konings RJ; Wiss T; Beneš O
Nat Mater; 2015 Mar; 14(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 25698420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
