These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22339382)

  • 1. Evaluation of outgassing, tear strength, and detail reproduction in alginate substitute materials.
    Baxter RT; Lawson NC; Cakir D; Beck P; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 22339382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring.
    Nassar U; Hussein B; Oko A; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c2. PubMed ID: 22322019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives.
    Patel RD; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 20970539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gypsum compatibility of antimicrobial alginates after spray disinfection.
    King BB; Norling BK; Seals R
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 3(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 7866505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution.
    Abdullah MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
    Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irreversible hydrocolloid and gypsum interactions.
    Reisbick MH; Johnston WM; Rashid RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 9484064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
    Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.