325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22339382)
1. Evaluation of outgassing, tear strength, and detail reproduction in alginate substitute materials.
Baxter RT; Lawson NC; Cakir D; Beck P; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 22339382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring.
Nassar U; Hussein B; Oko A; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C
J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c2. PubMed ID: 22322019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives.
Patel RD; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 20970539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gypsum compatibility of antimicrobial alginates after spray disinfection.
King BB; Norling BK; Seals R
J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 3(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 7866505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution.
Abdullah MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Irreversible hydrocolloid and gypsum interactions.
Reisbick MH; Johnston WM; Rashid RG
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 9484064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
