218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22339747)
1. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?
Rockall AG; Ghosh S; Alexander-Sefre F; Babar S; Younis MT; Naz S; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16310245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
Bhosale P; Peungjesada S; Devine C; Balachandran A; Iyer R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 21084900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Staging of cervix cancer using MRT].
Einspieler R; Ebner F; Hofmann HM; Ranner G; Tamussino K; Justich E
Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 2154013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and follow-up.
Ebner F; Tamussino K; Kressel HY
Magn Reson Q; 1994 Mar; 10(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 8161484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging in FIGO Staging of Primary Carcinoma Cervix: Experience from a tertiary cancer center.
Mohan N; V J; Prahladan A; K R
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2022 Aug; 18(4):465-472. PubMed ID: 34818450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Uterine cervix cancers: staging by magnetic resonance imaging].
Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Di Stefano-Louineau D; Gaubert JY; Delannoy L; Delpero JR; Blanc B; Kasbarian M
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(4-5):241-7. PubMed ID: 2268127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of MRI on therapeutic decisions in invasive cervical carcinoma. Direct comparison with the pelvic examination as a preperative test.
Postema S; Pattynama PM; van den Berg-Huysmans A; Peters LW; Kenter G; Trimbos JB
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Dec; 79(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 11104625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of uterine cervical cancer].
Matsubara M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 45(10):1115-22. PubMed ID: 8245590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
