1328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22339945)
1. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic posterior three-unit FDPs made of In-Ceram Zirconia.
Eschbach S; Wolfart S; Bohlsen F; Kern M
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):490-2. PubMed ID: 20095200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated copings from titanium: 6-year clinical results.
Hey J; Beuer F; Bensel T; Boeckler AF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 24529840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design.
Wolfart S; Harder S; Eschbach S; Lehmann F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 117(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 20121939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
Boeckler AF; Lee H; Stadler A; Setz JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic.
Ortega R; Gonzalo E; Gomez-Polo M; Suárez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Schropp L; Isidor F
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 27148986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
