BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22339945)

  • 41. Randomized clinical trial of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Clark AE; Shuster JJ; Anusavice KJ
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 23758092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Survival and chipping of zirconia-based and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
    Schwarz S; Schröder C; Hassel A; Bömicke W; Rammelsberg P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e119-25. PubMed ID: 21985745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review.
    Heintze SD; Rousson V
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):493-502. PubMed ID: 21209982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Monaco C; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Arena A; Scotti R
    J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():56-63. PubMed ID: 28736293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An intraindividual clinical comparison of two metal-ceramic systems: a 5-year prospective study.
    Marklund S; Bergman B; Hedlund SO; Nilson H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 12675459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical outcome of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with laser-sintering technology.
    Abou Tara M; Eschbach S; Bohlsen F; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 21210003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A prospective study of implant-supported full-arch yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal mandibular fixed dental prostheses: three-year results.
    Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P; Nilner K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 20617228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical performance of two different CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic crowns: 2-Year results.
    Seydler B; Schmitter M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 25935085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Failure modes and fracture origins of porcelain veneers on bilayer dental crowns.
    Liu Y; Liu G; Wang Y; Shen JZ; Feng H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 24596912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses: Up-to ten-year results.
    Ioannidis A; Bindl A
    J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():80-5. PubMed ID: 26844399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
    Mahmood DJ; Linderoth EH; Vult Von Steyern P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Jul; 69(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 21231816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Practice-based clinical evaluation of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 3-year results.
    Rinke S; Schäfer S; Lange K; Gersdorff N; Roediger M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Mar; 40(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 23211063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. 10-year clinical outcomes of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks.
    Sax C; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(3):183-202. PubMed ID: 22141229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.