287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22340311)
1. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Wang HL; Lü FZ; Jiang JY; Ma X; Xia XL; Wang LX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 22340311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar instability by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Liang B; Yin G; Zhao J; Li N; Hu Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1449-54. PubMed ID: 22242343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.
Wu J; Zhang C; Lu K; Li C; Zhou Y
Pain Physician; 2019 Nov; 22(6):E587-E599. PubMed ID: 31775412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.
Bagan B; Patel N; Deutsch H; Harrop J; Sharan A; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff JK
Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():281-6. PubMed ID: 18802914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability].
Gu GF; Zhang HL; He SS; Gu X; Zhang LG; Ding Y; Jia JB; Zhou X
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1081-5. PubMed ID: 22333447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies.
Stevens KJ; Spenciner DB; Griffiths KL; Kim KD; Zwienenberg-Lee M; Alamin T; Bammer R
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 16760779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis stenosis].
Ding Y; He S; Zhang H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(4):404-8. PubMed ID: 23757864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical study on lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Ren XJ; Chu TW; Wang WD; Zheng WJ; Pan Y; Huang B
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1076-80. PubMed ID: 22333446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Lau D; Lee JG; Han SJ; Lu DC; Chou D
J Clin Neurosci; 2011 May; 18(5):624-7. PubMed ID: 21349719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Rosen DS; Ferguson SD; Ogden AT; Huo D; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2008 Nov; 63(5):956-60; discussion 960. PubMed ID: 19005386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of traumatic related index in serum between minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for tissue injury].
Zou S; Wang J; Pan W; Zheng Y; Huang B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 27(8):960-4. PubMed ID: 24171351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
