These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2234065)

  • 21. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NIH sued over misconduct case.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1990 Aug; 249(4968):471. PubMed ID: 2382126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Next step, if any, lies with NIH in alleged scientific fraud; nobelist claims vindication.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(8):958. PubMed ID: 1501313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A shaky consensus on misconduct.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5057):604-5. PubMed ID: 1585170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NIH Office of Scientific Integrity: policies and procedures.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Science; 1990 Sep; 249(4974):1227-8. PubMed ID: 2399458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neuroscientist accused of misconduct turns on his accusers.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6675):424. PubMed ID: 9548238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Second opinion. The heat is on Gallo--again.
    Beardsley T
    Sci Am; 1990 May; 262(5):19-20. PubMed ID: 2185540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. National Institutes of Health. Fraudbuster ends hunger strike.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1715. PubMed ID: 8511574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH leak policy honored in the breach.
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5057):603. PubMed ID: 1585169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. NIH launches surprise Gallo investigation.
    Anderson C; Concar D; Anderson A
    Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6293):502. PubMed ID: 2170849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Give the hunger-striker a break.
    Maddox J
    Nature; 1993 Jun; 363(6430):579. PubMed ID: 8510746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gallo investigation raises new questions.
    Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5031):507. PubMed ID: 1948019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats?
    Tokarski C
    J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Extracting the teeth from the False Claims Act.
    Walter C; Richards EP
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9158993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dr Baltimore says "sorry".
    Baltimore D
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):94-5. PubMed ID: 2030740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US accused of 'cover-up' in defence of Gallo claims.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6513):372. PubMed ID: 7830778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Gallo case: is this really happening?
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1992 Jun; 339(8809):1594-5. PubMed ID: 1351562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.