147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22340773)
1. Impact of the transition to ICD-10 on Medicare inpatient hospital payments.
Mills RE; Butler RR; McCullough EC; Bao MZ; Averill RF
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev; 2011 Jun; 1(2):. PubMed ID: 22340773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Change in MS-DRG assignment and hospital reimbursement as a result of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid changes in payment for hospital-acquired conditions: is it coding or quality?
McNutt R; Johnson TJ; Odwazny R; Remmich Z; Skarupski K; Meurer S; Hohmann S; Harting B
Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 20042930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bundling post-acute care services into MS-DRG payments.
Vertrees JC; Averill RF; Eisenhandler J; Quain A; Switalski J
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev; 2013; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 24753970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Components of Medicare reimbursement.
Malatestinic W; Braun L; Jorgenson JA; Eskew J
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2003 Nov; 60(21 Suppl 6):S3-7. PubMed ID: 14619126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Medicare prospective payment survive the ICD-9-CM disease classification system?
McMahon LF; Smits HL
Ann Intern Med; 1986 Apr; 104(4):562-6. PubMed ID: 3082269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups differs in Europe and holds lessons for the United States.
Quentin W; Scheller-Kreinsen D; Blümel M; Geissler A; Busse R
Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):713-23. PubMed ID: 23569051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of the position of a hospital-acquired condition diagnosis code with changes in medicare severity diagnosis-related group assignment.
Johnson T; Kane JM; Odwazny R; McNutt R
J Hosp Med; 2014 Nov; 9(11):707-13. PubMed ID: 25211355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Medicaid Payments Relative to Medicare Using Inpatient Acute Care Claims from the Medicaid Program: Fiscal Year 2010-Fiscal Year 2011.
Stone DA; Dickensheets BA; Poisal JA
Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 53(1):326-340. PubMed ID: 28074495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The financial impact of Medicare diagnosis-related groups. Effect upon hospitals receiving cardiac patients referred for tertiary care.
Thomas F; Fox J; Clemmer TP; Orme JF; Vincent GM; Menlove RL
Chest; 1987 Mar; 91(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 3102172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrary to cost-shift theory, lower Medicare hospital payment rates for inpatient care lead to lower private payment rates.
White C
Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 May; 32(5):935-43. PubMed ID: 23650328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment system for acute care hospitals and fiscal year 2010 rates; and changes to the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and rate years 2010 and 2009 rates. Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2009 Aug; 74(165):43753-4236. PubMed ID: 19827228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in Diagnosis Related Groups for Inpatient Admissions and Associated Changes in Payment From 2012 to 2016.
Gluckman TJ; Spinelli KJ; Wang M; Yazdani A; Grunkemeier G; Bradley SM; Wasfy JH; Goyal A; Oseran A; Joynt Maddox KE
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2028470. PubMed ID: 33284340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are current DRG-based bundled payment models for lumbar fusions risk-adjusting adequately? An analysis of Medicare beneficiaries.
Malik AT; Phillips FM; Yu E; Khan SN
Spine J; 2020 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 31125696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system.
Hsia DC; Krushat WM; Fagan AB; Tebbutt JA; Kusserow RP
N Engl J Med; 1988 Feb; 318(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 3123929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effects of self-adapting G-DRG system 2004 to 2006 on in-patient services payment in pediatric hematology and oncology patients of a university hospital].
Christaras A; Schaper J; Strelow H; Laws HJ; Göbel U
Klin Padiatr; 2006; 218(6):366-78. PubMed ID: 17080340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in Hospital Billing for Total Joint Arthroplasty Based on Hospital Profit Status.
Hall BM; Odum SM; Fehring TK; Stryker LS
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):37-40. PubMed ID: 27067758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease.
Assaf AR; Lapane KL; McKenney JL; Carleton RA
N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(13):931-5. PubMed ID: 8361508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute Myocardial Infarction Cohorts Defined by
Levy AE; Hammes A; Anoff DL; Raines JD; Beck NM; Rudofker EW; Marshall KJ; Nensel JD; Messenger JC; Masoudi FA; Pierce RG; Allen LA; Ream KS; Ho PM
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 14(3):e006570. PubMed ID: 33653116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are we ready for bundled payments for major bowel surgery?
Sibia US; Turcotte JJ; Klune JR; Gibson GR
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4950-4956. PubMed ID: 31823048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
