195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22340897)
1. Pilot study to develop and test a generic peer feedback instrument to review videotaped consultations in primary care.
McMillan R; Cameron N; Power A
Qual Prim Care; 2011; 19(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 22340897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and initial validation of the Pharmacist Frequency of Interprofessional Collaboration Instrument (FICI-P) in primary care.
Van C; Costa D; Mitchell B; Abbott P; Krass I
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2012; 8(5):397-407. PubMed ID: 22222340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychosexual problems in general practice: measuring consultation competence using two different measures.
Jiwa M; O'Shea C; Merriman G; Halkett G; Spilsbury K
Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 20836940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.
McKay J; Pope L; Bowie P; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 19239594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses.
McKay J; Murphy DJ; Bowie P; Schmuck ML; Lough M; Eva KW
Qual Saf Health Care; 2007 Apr; 16(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 17403765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safer pharmacy practice: a preliminary study of significant event analysis and peer feedback.
Bradley NA; Power A; Hesselgreaves H; McMillan F; Bowie P
Int J Pharm Pract; 2009 Oct; 17(5):283-91. PubMed ID: 20214270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of a measure and a model of general practitioner attitudes toward collaboration with pharmacists.
Van C; Costa D; Mitchell B; Abbott P; Krass I
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(6):688-99. PubMed ID: 23395533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solicitations in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations: an observational study.
Weiss MC; Platt J; Riley R; Taylor G; Horrocks S; Taylor A
Fam Pract; 2013 Dec; 30(6):712-8. PubMed ID: 23934144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Appraisal of family doctors: an evaluation study.
Lewis M; Elwyn G; Wood F
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):454-60. PubMed ID: 12939890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accessibility, feasibility and educational impact of a peer review process for general practitioner consultation skills.
McMillan R
Qual Prim Care; 2012; 20(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 22824563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling.
Mercer SW; Neumann M; Wirtz M; Fitzpatrick B; Vojt G
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 18752916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?
Bowie P; Cooke S; Lo P; McKay J; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17518798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of the GP frequency of interprofessional collaboration instrument (FICI-GP) in primary care.
Van C; Costa D; Mitchell B; Abbott P; Krass I
J Interprof Care; 2012 Jul; 26(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 22563657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Training nurse practitioners for general practice. The EROS Project Team.
Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Jul; 49(444):531-5. PubMed ID: 10621986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of an assessment tool to measure the influence of clinical software on the delivery of high quality consultations. A study comparing two computerized medical record systems in a nurse run heart clinic in a general practice setting.
de Lusignan S; Wells SE; Russell C; Bevington WP; Arrowsmith P
Med Inform Internet Med; 2002 Dec; 27(4):267-80. PubMed ID: 12745907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review as a quality assurance mechanism in three pharmacist-run medication-refill clinics.
Cram DL; Stebbins M; Eom HS; Ratto N; Sugiyama D
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Nov; 49(11):2727-30. PubMed ID: 1471637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility.
Ram P; Grol R; Rethans JJ; Schouten B; van der Vleuten C; Kester A
Med Educ; 1999 Jun; 33(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 10354322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure.
Mercer SW; Maxwell M; Heaney D; Watt GC
Fam Pract; 2004 Dec; 21(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 15528286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
