These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22341047)

  • 1. Investigation of microbubble response to long pulses used in ultrasound-enhanced drug delivery.
    Mannaris C; Averkiou MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 22341047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling non-spherical oscillations and stability of acoustically driven shelled microbubbles.
    Loughran J; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4349-57. PubMed ID: 22712909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Streaming flow from ultrasound contrast agents by acoustic waves in a blood vessel model.
    Cho E; Chung SK; Rhee K
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Sep; 62():66-74. PubMed ID: 26025507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatiotemporal evolution of cavitation dynamics exhibited by flowing microbubbles during ultrasound exposure.
    Choi JJ; Coussios CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3538-49. PubMed ID: 23145633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surfactant shedding and gas diffusion during pulsed ultrasound through a microbubble contrast agent suspension.
    O'Brien JP; Stride E; Ovenden N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1416-27. PubMed ID: 23927137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
    Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambient pressure dependence of the ultra-harmonic response from contrast microbubbles.
    Sun T; Jia N; Zhang D; Xu D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4358-64. PubMed ID: 22712910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined effect of ultrasound/SonoVue microbubble on CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells viability and optimized parameters for its transfection.
    Shi C; Zhang Y; Yang H; Dong T; Chen Y; Xu Y; Yang X
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Sep; 62():97-102. PubMed ID: 26048174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles.
    Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18343022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaction of an ultrasound-activated contrast microbubble with a wall at arbitrary separation distances.
    Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(20):7909-25. PubMed ID: 26407104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined optical and acoustical detection of single microbubble dynamics.
    Sijl J; Vos HJ; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3271-81. PubMed ID: 22087999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast Agent Microbubble Jetting during Initial Interaction with 200-kHz Focused Ultrasound.
    Cleve S; Inserra C; Prentice P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):3075-3080. PubMed ID: 31477370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell.
    Postema M; Schmitz G
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2007 Apr; 14(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 17218145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of acoustic pressure on ambient pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent.
    Andersen KS; Jensen JA
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 19822339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of contrast agents to ultrasound.
    Sboros V
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2008 Jun; 60(10):1117-36. PubMed ID: 18486270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficiency and stability of bubble formation by acoustic vaporization of submicron perfluorocarbon droplets.
    Reznik N; Shpak O; Gelderblom EC; Williams R; de Jong N; Versluis M; Burns PN
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Sep; 53(7):1368-76. PubMed ID: 23652262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New doxorubicin-loaded phospholipid microbubbles for targeted tumor therapy: Part I--Formulation development and in-vitro characterization.
    Tinkov S; Winter G; Coester C; Bekeredjian R
    J Control Release; 2010 Apr; 143(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 20060861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
    Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.