268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22341295)
1. Quality of lymphadenectomy is equivalent with robotic and open cystectomy using an extended template.
Abaza R; Dangle PP; Gong MC; Bahnson RR; Pohar KS
J Urol; 2012 Apr; 187(4):1200-4. PubMed ID: 22341295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
Steven K; Poulsen AL
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer with increased nodal yield.
Lavery HJ; Martinez-Suarez HJ; Abaza R
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1802-5. PubMed ID: 21070571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes.
Desai MM; Berger AK; Brandina RR; Zehnder P; Simmons M; Aron M; Skinner EC; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):350-5. PubMed ID: 22036642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Super extended versus extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparative study.
Zehnder P; Studer UE; Skinner EC; Dorin RP; Cai J; Roth B; Miranda G; Birkhäuser F; Stein J; Burkhard FC; Daneshmand S; Thalmann GN; Gill IS; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1261-8. PubMed ID: 21849183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: the issue of extent and feasibility in the minimally invasive era.
Ghavamian R; Hakimi AA
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2009 Dec; 9(12):1783-92. PubMed ID: 19954290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extended versus limited lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy: impact on recurrence pattern and survival.
Jensen JB; Ulhøi BP; Jensen KM
Int J Urol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 22050425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome after radical cystectomy with limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Dhar NB; Klein EA; Reuther AM; Thalmann GN; Madersbacher S; Studer UE
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):873-8; discussion 878. PubMed ID: 18221953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
Stein JP
Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy: lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection.
Davis JW; Gaston K; Anderson R; Dinney CP; Grossman HB; Munsell MF; Kamat AM
J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 21074799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radical cystectomy: extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall.
Poulsen AL; Horn T; Steven K
J Urol; 1998 Dec; 160(6 Pt 1):2015-9; discussion 2020. PubMed ID: 9817313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stage-specific impact of extended versus standard pelvic lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy.
Simone G; Papalia R; Ferriero M; Guaglianone S; Castelli E; Collura D; Muto G; Gallucci M
Int J Urol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 22970939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node mapping in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and lymph node dissection to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery.
Jensen JB; Ulhøi BP; Jensen KM
BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 20002670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymph node dissection technique is more important than lymph node count in identifying nodal metastases in radical cystectomy patients: a comparative mapping study.
Dorin RP; Daneshmand S; Eisenberg MS; Chandrasoma S; Cai J; Miranda G; Nichols PW; Skinner DG; Skinner EC
Eur Urol; 2011 Nov; 60(5):946-52. PubMed ID: 21802833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is bilateral extended pelvic lymphadenectomy necessary for strictly unilateral invasive bladder cancer?
Roth B; Zehnder P; Birkhäuser FD; Burkhard FC; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
J Urol; 2012 May; 187(5):1577-82. PubMed ID: 22425077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy and standardized extended lymphadenectomy for node-positive bladder cancer: prediction by lymph node positivity and density.
Wiesner C; Salzer A; Thomas C; Gellermann-Schultes C; Gillitzer R; Hampel C; Thüroff JW
BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 19220265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Wilson CM; Wilson TG
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1004-10. PubMed ID: 22366188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Mills RD; Turner WH; Fleischmann A; Markwalder R; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11435814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
