These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22341555)

  • 1. Dissociating linguistic and non-linguistic gesture processing: electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.
    Grosvald M; Gutierrez E; Hafer S; Corina D
    Brain Lang; 2012 Apr; 121(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 22341555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
    Zachau S; Korpilahti P; Hämäläinen JA; Ervast L; Heinänen K; Suominen K; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jul; 59():57-73. PubMed ID: 24751994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural systems supporting linguistic structure, linguistic experience, and symbolic communication in sign language and gesture.
    Newman AJ; Supalla T; Fernandez N; Newport EL; Bavelier D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(37):11684-9. PubMed ID: 26283352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age of acquisition effects differ across linguistic domains in sign language: EEG evidence.
    Malaia EA; Krebs J; Roehm D; Wilbur RB
    Brain Lang; 2020 Jan; 200():104708. PubMed ID: 31698097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical access in American Sign Language: an ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology.
    Gutierrez E; Williams D; Grosvald M; Corina D
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1468():63-83. PubMed ID: 22763237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of language deprivation in early childhood on L2 processing: An ERP comparison of deaf native signers and deaf signers with a delayed language acquisition.
    Skotara N; Salden U; Kügow M; Hänel-Faulhaber B; Röder B
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 May; 13():44. PubMed ID: 22554360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.
    Goldin-Meadow S; Mylander C
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1984; 49(3-4):1-151. PubMed ID: 6537463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP correlates of German Sign Language processing in deaf native signers.
    Hänel-Faulhaber B; Skotara N; Kügow M; Salden U; Bottari D; Röder B
    BMC Neurosci; 2014 May; 15():62. PubMed ID: 24884527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
    Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages.
    Meir I; Aronoff M; Börstell C; Hwang SO; Ilkbasaran D; Kastner I; Lepic R; Lifshitz Ben-Basat A; Padden C; Sandler W
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():189-207. PubMed ID: 27837693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working Memory for Linguistic and Non-linguistic Manual Gestures: Evidence, Theory, and Application.
    Rudner M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():679. PubMed ID: 29867655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion-sensitive cortex and motion semantics in American Sign Language.
    McCullough S; Saygin AP; Korpics F; Emmorey K
    Neuroimage; 2012 Oct; 63(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 22750056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study.
    Meade G; Midgley KJ; Sevcikova Sehyr Z; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Brain Lang; 2017 Jul; 170():50-61. PubMed ID: 28407510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Gesture and Linguistic Experience on Sign Perception.
    Gimeno-Martínez M; Costa A; Baus C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2020 Jan; 25(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 31504619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity.
    Brentari D; Di Renzo A; Keane J; Volterra V
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jan; 7(1):95-123. PubMed ID: 25529989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Form and Event Semantics Predict Transitivity in Silent Gestures: Evidence for Compositionality.
    Bradley C; Wilbur R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Aug; 47(8):e13331. PubMed ID: 37635624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sign language ability in young deaf signers predicts comprehension of written sentences in English.
    Andrew KN; Hoshooley J; Joanisse MF
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89994. PubMed ID: 24587174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Communicating about quantity without a language model: number devices in homesign grammar.
    Coppola M; Spaepen E; Goldin-Meadow S
    Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):1-25. PubMed ID: 23872365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: morphology in self-styled gesture systems.
    Goldin-Meadow S; Mylander C; Butcher C
    Cognition; 1995 Sep; 56(3):195-262. PubMed ID: 7554795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using transitional information in sign and gesture perception.
    Brozdowski C; Emmorey K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Jun; 236():103923. PubMed ID: 37087958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.