These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22342537)

  • 21. Effects of solicitor sex and attractiveness on receptivity to sexual offers: a field study.
    Guéguen N
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Oct; 40(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 21369773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unprotected sex and HIV risk taking among young gay men within boyfriend relationships.
    Hays RB; Kegeles SM; Coates TJ
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Aug; 9(4):314-29. PubMed ID: 9376206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Body image in homosexual persons].
    Łosiak J
    Psychiatr Pol; 2009; 43(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 19694404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meeting your match: how attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 19336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon.
    Dixson BJ; Dixson AF; Morgan B; Anderson MJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 17136587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Social support moderates the relationship between gay community integration and sexual risk behavior among gay male couples.
    Fergus S; Lewis MA; Darbes LA; Kral AH
    Health Educ Behav; 2009 Oct; 36(5):846-59. PubMed ID: 18625784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: a New Zealand-U.S. comparative study.
    Dixson BJ; Dixson AF; Bishop PJ; Parish A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Jun; 39(3):798-806. PubMed ID: 19139985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women.
    Dixson BJ; Grimshaw GM; Linklater WL; Dixson AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19688590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perception of men's beauty and attractiveness by women with low sexual desire.
    Ferdenzi C; Delplanque S; Vorontsova-Wenger O; Pool E; Bianchi-Demicheli F; Sander D
    J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):946-55. PubMed ID: 25496510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of ego-identity status in mating preferences.
    Dunkel CS; Papini DR
    Adolescence; 2005; 40(159):489-501. PubMed ID: 16268128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: sex and attractiveness effects.
    van Straaten I; Holland RW; Finkenauer C; Hollenstein T; Engels RC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19263209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cyber sexy: electronic game play and perceptions of attractiveness among college-aged men.
    Wack ER; Tantleff-Dunn S
    Body Image; 2008 Dec; 5(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 18753019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Red is romantic, but only for feminine females: sexual dimorphism moderates red effect on sexual attraction.
    Wen F; Zuo B; Wu Y; Sun S; Liu K
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Aug; 12(4):719-35. PubMed ID: 25300050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults.
    Peplau LA; Frederick DA; Yee C; Maisel N; Lever J; Ghavami N
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Oct; 38(5):713-25. PubMed ID: 18712469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.
    Little AC; Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Perrett DI
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Aug; 105(3):364-81. PubMed ID: 25040006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Effects of weight and shape on attractiveness ratings of female line drawings by restrained and nonrestrained eaters.
    Forestell CA; Humphrey TM; Stewart SH
    Eat Behav; 2004 May; 5(2):89-101. PubMed ID: 15093780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.