These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22342561)

  • 1. Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing.
    Xiao NG; Quinn PC; Ge L; Lee K
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 57():26-34. PubMed ID: 22342561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elastic facial movement influences part-based but not holistic processing.
    Xiao NG; Quinn PC; Ge L; Lee K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1457-67. PubMed ID: 23398253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Holistic processing of static and moving faces.
    Zhao M; Bülthoff I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1020-1035. PubMed ID: 28191990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A featural account for own-face processing? Looking for support from face inversion, composite face, and part-whole tasks.
    Lee JKW; Janssen SMJ; Estudillo AJ
    Iperception; 2022 Jul; 13(4):20416695221111409. PubMed ID: 35836702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic facial expressions are processed holistically, but not more holistically than static facial expressions.
    Tobin A; Favelle S; Palermo R
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1208-21. PubMed ID: 26208146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Abbas ZA; Duchaine B
    Perception; 2008; 37(8):1187-96. PubMed ID: 18853555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misaligned dynamic faces are processed holistically.
    Zhou Y; Lin J; Zhou G
    Vision Res; 2022 Feb; 191():107970. PubMed ID: 34784566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Holistic and featural processing's link to face recognition varies by individual and task.
    Leong BQZ; Estudillo AJ; Hussain Ismail AM
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16869. PubMed ID: 37803085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye tracking reveals a crucial role for facial motion in recognition of faces by infants.
    Xiao NG; Quinn PC; Liu S; Ge L; Pascalis O; Lee K
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):744-57. PubMed ID: 26010387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face motion form at learning influences the time course of face spatial frequency processing during test.
    Wang H; Lian Y; Wang A; Chen E; Liu C
    Biol Psychol; 2023 Oct; 183():108691. PubMed ID: 37748703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processes underlying the cross-race effect: an investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces.
    Mondloch CJ; Elms N; Maurer D; Rhodes G; Hayward WG; Tanaka JW; Zhou G
    Perception; 2010; 39(8):1065-85. PubMed ID: 20942358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic composite faces are processed holistically.
    Favelle S; Tobin A; Piepers D; Burke D; Robbins RA
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():26-32. PubMed ID: 25982714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Holistic face processing is influenced by non-conscious visual information.
    Jin H; Oxner M; Corballis PM; Hayward WG
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):300-326. PubMed ID: 34240413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-rigid, but not rigid, motion interferes with the processing of structural face information in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Maguinness C; Newell FN
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():281-95. PubMed ID: 25737056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responses in the right posterior superior temporal sulcus show a feature-based response to facial expression.
    Flack TR; Andrews TJ; Hymers M; Al-Mosaiwi M; Marsden SP; Strachan JW; Trakulpipat C; Wang L; Wu T; Young AW
    Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():14-23. PubMed ID: 25967084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A regional composite-face effect for species-specific recognition: Upper and lower halves play different roles in holistic processing of monkey faces.
    Wang Z; Quinn PC; Jin H; Sun YP; Tanaka JW; Pascalis O; Lee K
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():89-96. PubMed ID: 29653136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.
    Cheng XJ; McCarthy CJ; Wang TSL; Palmeri TJ; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):833-862. PubMed ID: 29683707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faces in motion: selectivity of macaque and human face processing areas for dynamic stimuli.
    Polosecki P; Moeller S; Schweers N; Romanski LM; Tsao DY; Freiwald WA
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 33(29):11768-73. PubMed ID: 23864665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between perception of human faces and body shapes: evidence from the composite illusion.
    Soria Bauser DA; Suchan B; Daum I
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 21093471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition priming and recognition of dynamic and static chimeras.
    Steede LL; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2006; 35(10):1367-82. PubMed ID: 17214382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.