156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22343338)
1. Application of a rules-based natural language parser to critical value reporting in anatomic pathology.
Owens SR; Balis UG; Lucas DR; Myers JL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Mar; 36(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 22343338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the electronic medical record to better define "no products of conception" as a critical value in anatomic pathology.
Renshaw A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 22180485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values.
Piva E; Sciacovelli L; Zaninotto M; Laposata M; Plebani M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 131(3):432-41. PubMed ID: 19228648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical values in pediatric surgical pathology: definition, implementation, and reporting in a children's hospital.
Coffin CM; Spilker K; Lowichik A; Zhou H; Nielson K; Erickson L; Pysher TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Dec; 128(6):1035-40. PubMed ID: 18024330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What do physicians tell laboratories when requesting tests? A multi-method examination of information supplied to the microbiology laboratory before and after the introduction of electronic ordering.
Georgiou A; Prgomet M; Toouli G; Callen J; Westbrook J
Int J Med Inform; 2011 Sep; 80(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 21757400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical diagnoses in surgical pathology: a retrospective single-institution study to monitor guidelines for communication of urgent results.
Huang EC; Kuo FC; Fletcher CD; Nosé V
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jul; 33(7):1098-102. PubMed ID: 19390422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
Silverman JF;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 16690478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospital electronic medical record-based public health surveillance system deployed during the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.
Gundlapalli AV; Olson J; Smith SP; Baza M; Hausam RR; Eutropius LJ; Pestotnik SL; Duncan K; Staggers N; Pincetl P; Samore MH
Am J Infect Control; 2007 Apr; 35(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 17433939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of laboratory data and information exchange in the electronic health record.
Wilkerson ML; Henricks WH; Castellani WJ; Whitsitt MS; Sinard JH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 139(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 25724028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
; Silverman JF; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Pereira TC; Swanson PE
Hum Pathol; 2006 Aug; 37(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 16867859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integrated pathology reporting, indexing, and retrieval system using natural language diagnoses.
Moore GW; Boitnott JK; Miller RE; Eggleston JC; Hutchins GM
Mod Pathol; 1988 Jan; 1(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 3070549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Foy JM; Earls MF
Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):e97-104. PubMed ID: 15629972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrepancy analysis, communication, and feedback for cytotechnologist quality improvement of nongynecologic cytopathology.
Whigham P; Ilario MJ; Flanagan MB; Mauser N; Raab SS; Ohori NP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Apr; 34(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 16544333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Communication of useful information from laboratory physicians to clinical physicians].
Shimetani N
Rinsho Byori; 2003 Apr; 51(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 12747256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stand-alone laboratory information systems versus laboratory modules incorporated in the electronic health record.
Sinard JH; Castellani WJ; Wilkerson ML; Henricks WH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Mar; 139(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25724027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unexpected expectations in critical values in anatomic pathology: improving agreement between pathologists and nonpathologists with the treatable immediately, life-threatening terminology.
Renshaw SA; Gould EW; Renshaw AA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 22032563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomic pathology laboratory information systems: a review.
Park SL; Pantanowitz L; Sharma G; Parwani AV
Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Mar; 19(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 22313836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.
Wurtz R; Cameron BJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 40(11):1638-43. PubMed ID: 15889362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integration of scanned document management with the anatomic pathology laboratory information system: analysis of benefits.
Schmidt RA; Simmons K; Grimm EE; Middlebrooks M; Changchien R
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 17050064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
