These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22343338)

  • 21. Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.
    Hammond EH; Flinner RL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Nov; 121(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 9372744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of immediate access to the electronic medical record on anatomic pathology performance.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jul; 140(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 23765541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [An opinion from a user: a nurse's point of view].
    Sugawara M; Asoda I; Taira Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1997 Aug; 45(8):745-8. PubMed ID: 9283225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
    Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A multi-institutional survey of critical diagnoses (critical values) in surgical pathology and cytology.
    Pereira TC; Silverman JF; LiVolsi V; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Swanson PE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Nov; 130(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 18854265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development, implementation and benefits of a rheumatology-specific electronic medical record application with automated display of outcome measures.
    Malaviya AN; Gogia SB
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2010 Oct; 13(4):347-60. PubMed ID: 21199470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assurance measures for critical diagnoses in anatomic pathology.
    Renshaw A; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 137(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 22338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should we customise critical value procedure according to patient origin and laboratory turnaround time?
    Salinas M; López-Garrigós M; Gutiérrez M; Lugo J; Flors L; Leiva-Salinas C
    J Clin Pathol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 23372177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the Way to New Horizons: Telemedicine in Oncology.
    Schlag PM
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(2):III-IV. PubMed ID: 10388041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intensive care telemedicine: evaluating a model for proactive remote monitoring and intervention in the critical care setting.
    Groves RH; Holcomb BW; Smith ML
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 131():131-46. PubMed ID: 18305328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. E-health, phase two: the imperative to integrate process automation with communication automation for large clinical reference laboratories.
    White L; Terner C
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2001; 15(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 11642146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Natural language processing to extract medical problems from electronic clinical documents: performance evaluation.
    Meystre S; Haug PJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):589-99. PubMed ID: 16359928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laboratory automation systems. An introduction to concepts and terminology.
    Markin RS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Oct; 98(4 Suppl 1):S3-10. PubMed ID: 1344701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meeting regulatory requirements by the use of cell phone text message notification with autoescalation and loop closure for reporting of critical laboratory results.
    Saw S; Loh TP; Ang SB; Yip JW; Sethi SK
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jul; 136(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 21685029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
    Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Downtime procedures for the 21st century: using a fully integrated health record for uninterrupted electronic reporting of laboratory results during laboratory information system downtimes.
    Oral B; Cullen RM; Diaz DL; Hod EA; Kratz A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jan; 143(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 25511148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [A role of clinical pathologists in Laboratory Information (Consulting) Center].
    Shimetani N; Ohtani H
    Rinsho Byori; 1999 Oct; 47(10):926-32. PubMed ID: 10590666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implementation of a closed-loop reporting system for critical values and clinical communication in compliance with goals of the joint commission.
    Parl FF; O'Leary MF; Kaiser AB; Paulett JM; Statnikova K; Shultz EK
    Clin Chem; 2010 Mar; 56(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 20040617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medical laboratory informatics.
    Pantanowitz L; Henricks WH; Beckwith BA
    Clin Lab Med; 2007 Dec; 27(4):823-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17950900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critical values in surgical pathology.
    Pereira TC; Liu Y; Silverman JF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Aug; 122(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15323136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.