These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2234388)

  • 21. Analysis of Radiation Doses and Dose Reduction Strategies During Cerebral Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Yi HJ; Sung JH; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SW
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 100():216-223. PubMed ID: 28089806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease.
    Hankey GJ; Warlow CP; Sellar RJ
    Stroke; 1990 Feb; 21(2):209-22. PubMed ID: 2406993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Complications of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease.
    Warnock NG; Gandhi MR; Bergvall U; Powell T
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):855-8. PubMed ID: 8220965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography and tips on avoidance.
    Pryor JC; Setton A; Nelson PK; Berenstein A
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 1996 Aug; 6(3):751-8. PubMed ID: 8873102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Heparin and air filters reduce embolic events caused by intra-arterial cerebral angiography: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Bendszus M; Koltzenburg M; Bartsch AJ; Goldbrunner R; Günthner-Lengsfeld T; Weilbach FX; Roosen K; Toyka KV; Solymosi L
    Circulation; 2004 Oct; 110(15):2210-5. PubMed ID: 15466635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries. Special reference to contrast media.
    Nakstad P; Bakke SJ; Kjartansson O; Nyhus S
    Neuroradiology; 1986; 28(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 3523283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Active Rebleeding of a Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm During Diagnostic Catheter Angiography.
    Celtikci P; Eraslan O; Ergun O; Guldogan ES; Turkoglu ME
    Turk Neurosurg; 2018; 28(6):1009-1012. PubMed ID: 28481396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of complication rates of meglumine diatrizoate and meglumine iothalamate in cerebral angiography.
    Kricheff II; Chase NE
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1967 Sep; 101(1):220-3. PubMed ID: 5341249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of asymmetry in cerebral blood flow between brain hemispheres using digital subtraction angiography.
    Divani AA; Qureshi AI; Hoffman KR; Suri MF; Kirmani JF
    J Neuroimaging; 2006 Apr; 16(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16629736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cerebral angiography using gadolinium as an alternative contrast medium in a patient with severe allergy to iodinated contrast medium.
    Sakamoto S; Eguchi K; Shibukawa M; Kiura Y; Yamasaki F; Kajiwara Y; Matsushige T; Kurisu K
    Hiroshima J Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 59(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 20518256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Iohexol and ioxaglate in cerebral angiography.
    Thron A; Ratzka M; Voigt K; Nadjmi M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():115-9. PubMed ID: 6139065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinically silent cerebral embolisms after cerebral catheter angiography].
    Hähnel S; Bender J; Jansen O; Hartmann M; Knauth M; Büsing K; Sartor K
    Rofo; 2001 Apr; 173(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 11367837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intracranial applications of digital subtraction angiography.
    Carmody RF; Seeger JF
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1984; 23(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 6399014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital subtraction angiography: current clinical applications.
    Pelz DM; Fox AJ; Vinuela F
    Stroke; 1985; 16(3):528-36. PubMed ID: 4002273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography using 4-F-catheters for evaluating cerebrovascular insufficiency].
    Fiedler V; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1986 Aug; 26(8):395-400. PubMed ID: 3532175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Usefulness of selective cerebral intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography by transbrachial approach].
    Matsunaga N; Hayashi K; Uetani M; Hirao K; Fukuda T; Aikawa H; Iwao M; Hombo Z
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 May; 48(5):570-8. PubMed ID: 3412872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital subtraction angiography versus real-time fluoroscopy for detection of intravascular penetration prior to epidural steroid injections: meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Visnjevac O; Kim P; Farid-Davari S; Johnson P; Nader ND
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25675057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital subtraction cerebral angiography by intraarterial injection: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Brant-Zawadzki M; Gould R; Norman D; Newton TH; Lane B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Feb; 140(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 6336873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Contrast media in peripheral angiography: does cost reduction mean loss of quality and safety? A reevaluation based on a randomized double-blind comparative study of ioxaglate versus iopromide].
    Lammer J; Winkelbauer F; Thurnher S; Wildling R; Farres MT; Woessmer B
    Rofo; 1996 May; 164(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 8634406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.