These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22344026)

  • 1. A comparison between rebound and Goldmann's tonometers in screening of patients for glaucoma.
    Agrawal A; Pratap VP; Pal VK; Suman S
    Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2012; 4(1):201-2. PubMed ID: 22344026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative characteristics of current tonometric methods].
    Astakhov IuS; Akopov EL; Potemkin VV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 19062549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices.
    Chiara GF; Semes LP; Potter JW; Cutter GR; Tucker WR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 2703651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Perkins, Tono-Pen and Schiøtz tonometers in paediatric patients under general anaesthesia.
    Gharaei H; Kargozar A; Raygan F; Daneshvar R
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 19161112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A new screening method for determining tolerant intraocular pressure].
    Avetisov SE; Mamikonian VR; Kazarian EE; Shmeleva-Demir OA; Mazurova IuV; Ryzhkova EG; Galoian NS; Tatevosian AA
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2009; 125(5):3-7. PubMed ID: 19916324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oman Eye Study 2005: validity of screening tests used in the glaucoma survey.
    Khandekar R; Al Raisi A
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(6):1360-4. PubMed ID: 19161111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser.
    Ehrlich JR; Haseltine S; Shimmyo M; Radcliffe NM
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Oct; 24(10):1555-60. PubMed ID: 20508652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparing applanation and impression tonometry in Central African Bantu people].
    Krüger H; Schittkowski MP; Guthoff RF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Sep; 224(9):722-6. PubMed ID: 17846962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
    Pearce CD; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparative pressure studies with Goldmann; Mackay-Marg and pneumatic applanation tonometers.
    Jain MR; Marmion VJ
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1977 Oct; 25(3):29-35. PubMed ID: 614270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device.
    Asrani S; Chatterjee A; Wallace DK; Santiago-Turla C; Stinnett S
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 20436362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the IOPen® in a glaucomatous population.
    Jorge J; Fernandes P; Queirós A; Ribeiro P; Ferreira A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Nov; 30(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 21205273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.
    Brencher HL; Kohl P; Reinke AR; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 1822985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Are there genuine and pseudo-normal pressure glaucomas? Body position-dependent intraocular pressure values in normal pressure glaucoma].
    Mardin CY; Jonas J; Michelson G; Jünemann A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Oct; 211(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 9445910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical comparison of dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Yalcinbayir O; Baykara M; Atasoy A; Ozcetin H
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 20438047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of Diaton and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Bali SJ; Bhartiya S; Sobti A; Dada T; Panda A
    Ophthalmologica; 2012; 228(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 22398455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Popovich KS; Shields MB
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Feb; 6(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 9075080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.