BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22344100)

  • 1. Calibration of fringe projection profilometry with bundle adjustment strategy.
    Yin Y; Peng X; Li A; Liu X; Gao BZ
    Opt Lett; 2012 Feb; 37(4):542-4. PubMed ID: 22344100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved geometrical model of fringe projection profilometry.
    Huang Z; Xi J; Yu Y; Guo Q; Song L
    Opt Express; 2014 Dec; 22(26):32220-32. PubMed ID: 25607188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-shot color fringe projection for three-dimensional shape measurement of objects with discontinuities.
    Dai M; Yang F; He X
    Appl Opt; 2012 Apr; 51(12):2062-9. PubMed ID: 22534917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration method for projector-camera-based telecentric fringe projection profilometry system.
    Liu H; Lin H; Yao L
    Opt Express; 2017 Dec; 25(25):31492-31508. PubMed ID: 29245824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of generalized grating imaging to pattern projection in three-dimensional profilometry.
    Iwata K; Sando Y; Satoh K; Moriwaki K
    Appl Opt; 2011 Sep; 50(26):5115-21. PubMed ID: 21946993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexible calibration technique for fringe-projection-based three-dimensional imaging.
    Vo M; Wang Z; Hoang T; Nguyen D
    Opt Lett; 2010 Oct; 35(19):3192-4. PubMed ID: 20890330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid calibration procedure for fringe projection profilometry based on stereo vision and polynomial fitting.
    Vargas R; Marrugo AG; Zhang S; Romero LA
    Appl Opt; 2020 May; 59(13):D163-D169. PubMed ID: 32400639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully automated low-cost setup for fringe projection profilometry.
    Rivera-Ortega U; Dirckx J; Meneses-Fabian C
    Appl Opt; 2015 Feb; 54(6):1350-3. PubMed ID: 25968198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic recalibration of scalable fringe-projection systems for large-scale object metrology.
    Hovorov V; Lalor M; Burton D; Lilley F
    Appl Opt; 2010 Mar; 49(8):1459-71. PubMed ID: 20220903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-quality 3D correction of ring and radiant artifacts in flat panel detector-based cone beam volume CT imaging.
    Anas EM; Kim JG; Lee SY; Hasan MK
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6495-519. PubMed ID: 21934193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of three calibration methods for 3-D freehand ultrasound.
    Rousseau F; Hellier P; Letteboer MM; Niessen WJ; Barillot C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Nov; 25(11):1492-501. PubMed ID: 17117778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directional analysis of digitized three-dimensional images by configuration counts.
    Gutkowski P; Jensen EB; Kiderlen M
    J Microsc; 2004 Nov; 216(Pt 2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15516229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-accuracy and robust localization of large control markers for geometric camera calibration.
    Douxchamps D; Chihara K
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Feb; 31(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 19110502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems.
    Mercier L; Langø T; Lindseth F; Collins DL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 31(4):449-71. PubMed ID: 15831324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems.
    Mercier L; Langø T; Lindseth F; Collins LD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):143-65. PubMed ID: 15708453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple, flexible and automatic 3D calibration method for a phase calculation-based fringe projection imaging system.
    Zhang Z; Huang S; Meng S; Gao F; Jiang X
    Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(10):12218-27. PubMed ID: 23736442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise bias in the refinement of structures derived from single particles.
    Stewart A; Grigorieff N
    Ultramicroscopy; 2004 Dec; 102(1):67-84. PubMed ID: 15556702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple camera calibration from a single image using five points on two orthogonal 1-D objects.
    Miyagawa I; Arai H; Koike H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1528-38. PubMed ID: 20129859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fringe-projection profilometry based on two-dimensional empirical mode decomposition.
    Zheng S; Cao Y
    Appl Opt; 2013 Nov; 52(31):7648-53. PubMed ID: 24216669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile calibration based on laser metrology and approximation networks.
    Muñoz-Rodriguez JA
    Sensors (Basel); 2010; 10(8):7681-704. PubMed ID: 22163622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.