190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22344291)
1. The new Baha implant: a prospective osseointegration study.
D'Eredità R; Caroncini M; Saetti R
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jun; 146(6):979-83. PubMed ID: 22344291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TriVerse versus molecular resonance-harvested grafts in single-stage Baha surgery.
D'Eredita R; Cenzi M
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Apr; 142(4):560-4. PubMed ID: 20304278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation.
Dun CA; de Wolf MJ; Hol MK; Wigren S; Eeg-Olofsson M; Green K; Karlsmo A; Flynn MC; Stalfors J; Rothera M; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21725257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone-anchored hearing implant loading at 3 weeks: stability and tolerability after 6 months.
Faber HT; Dun CA; Nelissen RC; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Hol MK
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 23202148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability.
Nelissen RC; den Besten CA; Faber HT; Dun CA; Mylanus EA; Hol MK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 273(7):1731-7. PubMed ID: 26272679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: a 14-year experience.
Badran K; Arya AK; Bunstone D; Mackinnon N
J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Feb; 123(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 18492306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of stability measurements of the Baha® system in children.
Felton M; Hill-Feltham P; Bruce IA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 78(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 24467920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resonance frequency analysis of osseo-integrated implants for bone conduction in a pediatric population - a novel approach for assessing stability for early loading.
McLarnon C; Johnson I; Davison T; Hill J; Henderson B; Leese D; Marley S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):641-4. PubMed ID: 24518815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients.
Kraai T; Brown C; Neeff M; Fisher K
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 75(6):749-53. PubMed ID: 21470698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for early loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction at 4 weeks.
McLarnon CM; Johnson I; Davison T; Hill J; Henderson B; Leese D; Marley S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1578-82. PubMed ID: 23069746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Successful loading of a bone-anchored hearing implant at two weeks after surgery: randomized trial of two surgical methods and detailed stability measurements.
Høgsbro M; Agger A; Johansen LV
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e51-7. PubMed ID: 25341064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The BAHA hearing system for hearing-impaired postirradiated nasopharyngeal cancer patients: a new indication.
Soo G; Tong MC; Tsang WS; Wong TK; To KF; Leung SF; van Hasselt CA
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 19415040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Tumer C; Yenigul M; Avci M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 16958688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.
Han J; Lulic M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20666787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.
Dun CA; Faber HT; de Wolf MJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Hol MK
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb; 33(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 22246385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of implant stability measurement devices for bone-anchored hearing aid systems.
Westover L; Faulkner G; Hodgetts W; Raboud D
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):178-184. PubMed ID: 28533009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue overgrowth in bone-anchored hearing aid patients: use of 8.5 mm abutment.
Pelosi S; Chandrasekhar SS
J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Jun; 125(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 21457592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave abutment design.
Wilkie MD; Chakravarthy KM; Mamais C; Temple RH
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Dec; 151(6):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25245135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An experimental evaluation of a new craniofacial implant using the rabbit tibia model: Part II. Biomechanical findings.
Sennerby L; Gottlow J; Rosengren A; Flynn M
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):840-5. PubMed ID: 20502376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
