These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22344780)

  • 1. Another piece of the puzzle: psychometric properties of the J-SOAP-II.
    Fanniff AM; Letourneau EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Aug; 24(4):378-408. PubMed ID: 22344780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Keep testing the waters: Fanniff and Letourneau reply.
    Fanniff AM; Letourneau EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2014 Oct; 26(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 24737829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factor structure and validation of the juvenile sex offender assessment protocol (J-SOAP).
    Righthand S; Prentky R; Knight R; Carpenter E; Hecker JE; Nangle D
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Jan; 17(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 15757002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Juveniles Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses the Same Everywhere? Psychometric Properties of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II in a Portuguese Youth Sample.
    Barroso R; Pechorro P; Ramião E; Figueiredo P; Manita C; Gonçalves RA; Nobre P
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):806-825. PubMed ID: 31221049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baby with the bath water: response to Fanniff and Letourneau.
    Hecker JE
    Sex Abuse; 2014 Oct; 26(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 24583804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences.
    Aebi M; Plattner B; Steinhausen HC; Bessler C
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):456-73. PubMed ID: 21406605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II: Research and Practice Implications.
    Schwartz-Mette RA; Righthand S; Hecker J; Dore G; Huff R
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Aug; 32(5):499-520. PubMed ID: 30714853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next?
    Hempel I; Buck N; Cima M; van Marle H
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Feb; 57(2):208-28. PubMed ID: 22147101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):826-849. PubMed ID: 31248327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].
    Van Leeuwen NK; Chauchard E; Chabrol H; Gibbs J
    Encephale; 2013 Dec; 39(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 23537635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment impact of an integrated sex offender program as measured by J-SOAP-II.
    Rehfuss MC; Underwood LA; Enright M; Hill S; Marshall R; Tipton P; West L; Warren K
    J Correct Health Care; 2013 Apr; 19(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23475853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior among youth in a child welfare sample.
    Prentky RA; Li NC; Righthand S; Schuler A; Cavanaugh D; Lee AF
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 20101590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Influence of Age and Sexual Drive on the Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-Revised.
    Wijetunga C; Martinez R; Rosenfeld B; Cruise K
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Jan; 62(1):150-169. PubMed ID: 27255236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of the MMPI-A to assess personality of juvenile male delinquents who are sex offenders and nonsex offenders.
    Losada-Paisey G
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Aug; 83(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9775669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S; Bessler C; Landolt MA; Aebi M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sex offender treatment intervention and progress scale (SOTIPS): psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with static-99R.
    McGrath RJ; Lasher MP; Cumming GF
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Oct; 24(5):431-58. PubMed ID: 22368161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II in an Australian Context.
    Molnar T; Allard T; McKillop N; Rynne J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Aug; 66(10-11):1051-1070. PubMed ID: 31957511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of adult risk assessment tools with juveniles who offended sexually.
    Ralston CA; Epperson DL
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):905-16. PubMed ID: 23647039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using logistic regression modeling to predict sexual recidivism: the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-3 (MnSOST-3).
    Duwe G; Freske PJ
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Aug; 24(4):350-77. PubMed ID: 22291047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How useful are psychometric scores in predicting recidivism for treated sex offenders?
    Barnett GD; Wakeling HC; Mandeville-Norden R; Rakestrow J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 May; 56(3):420-46. PubMed ID: 21518697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.