These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22344781)

  • 1. Utilization and implications of the Static-99 in practice.
    Storey JE; Watt KA; Jackson KJ; Hart SD
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 22344781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).
    Worling JR; Bookalam D; Litteljohn A
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):203-23. PubMed ID: 21969313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in sex offender risk assessment.
    Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT; Caperton J; Rufino K
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):524-9. PubMed ID: 22023560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A large-scale evaluation of Risk Matrix 2000 in Scotland.
    Grubin D
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 21965466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex offender risk assessment: A reexamination of the coffee can study.
    Buttars A; Huss MT; Brack C
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():31-6. PubMed ID: 26286489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of dynamic risk factors: an independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version.
    Beggs SM; Grace RC
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):234-51. PubMed ID: 20458126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting relapse for Catholic clergy sex offenders: the use of the static-99.
    Montana S; Thompson G; Ellsworth P; Lagan H; Helmus L; Rhoades CJ
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Dec; 24(6):575-90. PubMed ID: 22593148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: an investigation of predictive and incremental validity.
    Eher R; Matthes A; Schilling F; Haubner-Maclean T; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):5-28. PubMed ID: 21537058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does field reliability for Static-99 scores decrease as scores increase?
    Rice AK; Boccaccini MT; Harris PB; Hawes SW
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1085-94. PubMed ID: 24932647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?
    Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Oct; 18(4):343-55. PubMed ID: 17136627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invalidity of "disconfirmation of the predictive validity of the self-appraisal questionnaire in a sample of high-risk drug offenders" (2006): a reply.
    Dhaliwal GK; Loza W; Reddon JR
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1077-89. PubMed ID: 17709811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construct Validity of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version Instrument in a Multisite Sample of Treated Sexual Offenders.
    Olver ME; Neumann CS; Kingston DA; Nicholaichuk TP; Wong SCP
    Assessment; 2018 Jan; 25(1):40-55. PubMed ID: 27084836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Same score, different message: perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format.
    Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Cuervo VA; Murrie DC; Clark JW
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Oct; 38(5):418-27. PubMed ID: 24377910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)].
    Rossegger A; Gerth J; Urbaniok F; Laubacher A; Endrass J
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2010 Nov; 78(11):658-67. PubMed ID: 21069631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of actuarials at civil commitment hearings to predict the likelihood of future sexual violence.
    Berlin FS; Galbreath NW; Geary B; McGlone G
    Sex Abuse; 2003 Oct; 15(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 14571541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.