These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22346161)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of the length of resin tags, viscosity and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants - an in vitro scanning electron microscope study.
    Prabhakar AR; Murthy SA; Sugandhan S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Oct; 2(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 22346161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An
    Singh R; Lakhanam M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):304-310. PubMed ID: 35991789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of Moisture-tolerant and Conventional Resin-based Sealant in Six- to Nine-year-old Children.
    Khatri SG; Samuel SR; Acharya S; Patil S; Madan K
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 26314605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of the Viscosity and Length of Resin Tags of Conventional and Hydrophilic Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Molars: An
    Prabakar J; John J; Arumugham IM; Kumar RP; Sakthi DS
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):388-394. PubMed ID: 30166832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.
    Arastoo S; Behbudi A; Rakhshan V
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage and SEM analysis of flowable resin used as a sealant following three fissure preparation techniques--an in vitro study.
    Chaitra TR; Subba RV; Devarasa GM; Ravishankar TL
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 35(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 21678670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Prabakar J; Jeevanandan G; Kengadaran S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(5):745-750. PubMed ID: 38162245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Evaluation of Retention of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent First Molars: An 18 Months Follow-up: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Gyati O; Jain M; Sogi S; Shahi P; Sharma P; Ramesh A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 37519987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.
    Tavangar M; Zohri Z; Sheikhnezhad H; Shahbeig S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):867-873. PubMed ID: 28989122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of in vitro penetration and adaptation of moisture tolerant resin sealant and conventional resin sealant in different fissure types.
    Iyer RR; Gopalakrishnapillai AC; Kalantharakath T
    Chin J Dent Res; 2013; 16(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 24436948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Embrace-WetBond and Fissurit F Pit and Fissure Sealants' Marginal Sealing Abilities.
    Joshi KH; Avula SK; Sahu D; Mishra G; Agrawal R; Alessa N; Babaji P
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 2):S1227-S1229. PubMed ID: 37693958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Moisture-tolerant Sealant and Glass Ionomer Sealant Using Stereomicroscope: An
    Priscilla S; Shivashankarappa PG; Mohandoss S; Muthukrishnan K; Gem E
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S67-S71. PubMed ID: 37663211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage and penetration capability of various pit and fissure sealants upon different sealant application techniques.
    Juntavee A; Juntavee N; Chaisuntitrakoon A; Millstein PL; Abedian B
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e810-e820. PubMed ID: 37933397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage Assessment of Different Preparation Techniques and Pit and Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars.
    Bangash M; Humayun M; Anser M; Chaudhary FA; Arjumand B; Alharkan HM
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50382. PubMed ID: 38213342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents.
    Hannig M; Gräfe A; Atalay S; Bott B
    J Dent; 2004 Jan; 32(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 14659721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Aging on the Microhardness of Different Resin-based Fluoride-releasing Fissure Sealants: An
    Sulimany AM; BinSaleh SS; AlYahya E; Bataweel R; Alhussain I; Almahdy A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Oct; 22(10):1144-1149. PubMed ID: 35197382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage Assessment of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.
    Prabakar J; Indiran MA; Kumar P; Dooraikannan S; Jeevanandan G
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(Suppl 1):S29-S33. PubMed ID: 34434011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond
    Swathy RS; Naidu J
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 37020754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vitro Evaluation of Different Protocols for Preventing Microleakage of Fissure Sealants Placed Following Saliva Contamination.
    Şimşek H; Yazıcı AR; Güngör HC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Aug; 44(4):240-248. PubMed ID: 33167017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability, penetration and adaptation of a self etching pit and fissure sealant- stereomicroscopic and scanning electron microscopic analyses.
    Garg D; Mahabala K; Lewis A; Natarajan S; Nayak A; Rao A
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jun; 11(6):e547-e552. PubMed ID: 31346375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.