These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2234815)
21. Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry. Evidence for a learning effect. Wood JM; Wild JM; Hussey MK; Crews SJ Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1987 Jun; 65(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 3618158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study. Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the Brusini glaucoma staging system for typing and staging of perimetric results. Koçak I; Zulauf M; Bergamin O Ophthalmologica; 1998; 212(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 9672208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. K-Train--a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate. Schiefer U; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Pätzold J; Johnson CA Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 244(10):1300-9. PubMed ID: 16550404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening? Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Topography of the frequency doubling perimetry visual field compared with that of short wavelength and achromatic automated perimetry visual fields. Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16361671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument. Papp A; Kis K; Németh J Ophthalmologica; 2001; 215(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 11244336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in goldmann kinetic perimetry. Niederhauser S; Mojon DS Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 12566882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma. Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual field area on the Goldmann hemispheric perimeter surface. Correction of cartographic errors inherent in perimetry. Kirkham TH; Meyer E Curr Eye Res; 1981; 1(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7297100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Computer program controlled perimetry, its advantages and disadvantages]. Herbolzheimer WG Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Oct; 189(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 3807218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry. Frisén L Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma. Nouri-Mahdavi K Can J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 25433738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. JO and STATJO: programs for investigating the visual field with the Octopus automatic perimeter. Flammer J; Drance SM; Jenni A; Bebie H Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 18(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 6688197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Heidelberg Edge Perimeter: The New Method of Perimetry. Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Misiuk-Hojło M Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(6):1105-12. PubMed ID: 26771985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension. Kaczorowski K; Mulak M; Szumny D; Baranowska M; Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J; Misiuk-Hojło M Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Shimomura Y Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2092-9. PubMed ID: 25744980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter]. Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Progression detection in glaucoma can be made more efficient by using a variable interval between successive visual field tests. Jansonius NM Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 245(11):1647-51. PubMed ID: 17437124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]