These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22348434)

  • 1. Producing and recognizing words with two pronunciation variants: evidence from novel schwa words.
    Bürki A; Frauenfelder UH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 22348434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical representation of schwa words: two mackerels, but only one salami.
    Bürki A; Gaskell MG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):617-31. PubMed ID: 22082232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How much does orthography influence the processing of reduced word forms? Evidence from novel-word learning about French schwa deletion.
    Viebahn MC; McQueen JM; Ernestus M; Frauenfelder UH; Bürki A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2378-2394. PubMed ID: 30362403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listeners' processing of a given reduced word pronunciation variant directly reflects their exposure to this variant: Evidence from native listeners and learners of French.
    Brand S; Ernestus M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1240-1259. PubMed ID: 28374635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological neighbourhood effects in French spoken-word recognition.
    Dufour S; Frauenfelder UH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):226-38. PubMed ID: 19806483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: the role of variant frequency.
    Connine CM; Ranbom LJ; Patterson DJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 18459250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: evidence from Spanish and French.
    Cuetos F; Bonin P; Alameda JR; Caramazza A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):750-71. PubMed ID: 19728227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects.
    Strijkers K; Costa A; Thierry G
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Apr; 20(4):912-28. PubMed ID: 19679542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of assimilation in newly learned novel words.
    Snoeren ND; Gaskell MG; Di Betta AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):542-9. PubMed ID: 19271865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociative contributions of semantic and lexical-phonological information to immediate recognition.
    Nishiyama R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 22774851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What affects the presence versus absence of schwa and its duration: a corpus analysis of French connected speech.
    Bürki A; Ernestus M; Gendrot C; Fougeron C; Frauenfelder UH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3980-91. PubMed ID: 22225052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects.
    Sumner M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL26-32. PubMed ID: 23862902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.
    Zhao J; Guo J; Zhou F; Shu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1761-70. PubMed ID: 21382389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological variant recognition: representations and rules.
    Pinnow E; Connine CM
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):42-67. PubMed ID: 24754220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The word frequency effect in picture naming: contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures.
    Shatzman KB; Schiller NO
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):160-9. PubMed ID: 15172534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming.
    Bonin P; Roux S; Barry C; Canell L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1741-58. PubMed ID: 22612168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word length and lexical activation: longer is better.
    Pitt MA; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1120-35. PubMed ID: 17002526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.