These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22348526)

  • 1. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.
    Cheng J; Pullenayegum E; Marshall DA; Marshall JK; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Feb; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22348526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advancing Colorectal Cancer Detection With Blood-Based Tests: Qualitative Study and Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Population Preferences.
    Ong C; Cook AR; Tan KK; Wang Y
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Jul; 10():e53200. PubMed ID: 39018093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COVID-19 Vaccine Preferences in General Populations in Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Salisbury D; Lazarus JV; Waite N; Lehmann C; Sri Bhashyam S; de la Cruz M; Hahn B; Rousculp MD; Bonanni P
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Oct; 10():e57242. PubMed ID: 39412841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey.
    Marshall DA; Johnson FR; Kulin NA; Ozdemir S; Walsh JM; Marshall JK; Van Bebber S; Phillips KA
    Health Econ; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1420-39. PubMed ID: 19191268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey.
    Marshall DA; Johnson FR; Phillips KA; Marshall JK; Thabane L; Kulin NA
    Value Health; 2007; 10(5):415-30. PubMed ID: 17888107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
    Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Howard K; Salkeld G
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the preferences and willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening: an opportunity to incorporate the perspective of population at risk into policy development in Thailand.
    Phisalprapa P; Ngorsuraches S; Wanishayakorn T; Kositamongkol C; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):226-233. PubMed ID: 33467947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preferences of Iranian average risk population for colorectal cancer screening tests.
    Ramezani Doroh V; Delavari A; Yaseri M; Emamgholipour Sefiddashti S; Akbarisari A
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2019 May; 32(4):677-687. PubMed ID: 31111783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferences for potential innovations in non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: A labeled discrete choice experiment for a Dutch screening campaign.
    Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Dirksen CD; Severens JL
    Acta Oncol; 2014 Jul; 53(7):898-908. PubMed ID: 24456499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.
    Mühlbacher AC; Junker U; Juhnke C; Stemmler E; Kohlmann T; Leverkus F; Nübling M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 16(6):613-28. PubMed ID: 24950770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.
    Mansfield C; Tangka FK; Ekwueme DU; Smith JL; Guy GP; Li C; Hauber AB
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2016 Feb; 13():E27. PubMed ID: 26916898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study.
    Veldwijk J; Determann D; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Korfage IJ; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():45. PubMed ID: 27098746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the Preferences and Considerations of the Public Towards Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Think-Aloud Interviews Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Dennison RA; Clune RJ; Morris S; Thomas C; Usher-Smith JA
    Health Expect; 2024 Aug; 27(4):e14153. PubMed ID: 39030943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eliciting preferences for cancer screening tests: Comparison of a discrete choice experiment and the threshold technique.
    Valentine KD; Shaffer VA; Hauber B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2023 Oct; 115():107898. PubMed ID: 37467593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Brinkmann M; Diedrich L; Hemmerling M; Krauth C; Robra BP; Stahmeyer JT; Dreier M
    Value Health; 2023 Jan; 26(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 36031478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.