BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22348698)

  • 1. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
    McGuire MK; Nunn M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
    Alkan EA; Parlar A
    J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
    Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
    J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
    Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
    J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
    Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB plus β-tricalcium phosphate or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 5 years.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Snyder MB
    J Periodontol; 2014 Oct; 85(10):1361-70. PubMed ID: 24694077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
    Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronally advanced flap alone or with connective tissue graft in the treatment of single gingival recession defects: a long-term randomized clinical trial.
    Kuis D; Sciran I; Lajnert V; Snjaric D; Prpic J; Pezelj-Ribaric S; Bosnjak A
    J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1576-85. PubMed ID: 23432657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
    Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
    J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
    McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
    J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enamel matrix derivative (emdogain) or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a pilot study.
    Alkan EA; Parlar A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 23998158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
    Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
    Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of the long term results of root coverage with connective tissue graft or enamel matrix protein: 24-month results.
    Abolfazli N; Saleh-Saber F; Eskandari A; Lafzi A
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E304-9. PubMed ID: 19300369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation.
    McGuire MK; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14514225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
    Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
    Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession.
    Cueva MA; Boltchi FE; Hallmon WW; Nunn ME; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Rees T
    J Periodontol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):949-56. PubMed ID: 15341352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.