These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2234888)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of digital dental radiograph imaging systems.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Pilgram TK; Shrout MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):661-8. PubMed ID: 2234888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage HM; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 8233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage MH; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 8233433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
    Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
    Workman A; Brettle DS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
    Mairgünther RH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions.
    Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Nummikoski P; Matteson S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Nov; 74(5):652-60. PubMed ID: 1437069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of photodensitometric with high-resolution digital analysis of bone density from serial dental radiographs.
    Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes A; Pun T; Cimasoni G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1397451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy.
    Reddy MS
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12 Suppl):1078-84. PubMed ID: 1479529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal computer equipment for dental digital subtraction radiography vs. industrial computer equipment and conventional radiography.
    Möystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA
    Scand J Dent Res; 1992 Apr; 100(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1574677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Logarithmic amplifier for computed tomography tasks using fluoroscopic projections.
    Buliev I; Badea C; Pallikarakis N
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 12490030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sources of noise in digital subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Sewerin I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Apr; 71(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 2052339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital radiographic images will benefit endodontic services.
    Lavelle CL; Wu CJ
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1995 Dec; 11(6):253-60. PubMed ID: 8617158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.