These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2234889)

  • 1. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
    Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 2234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
    Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
    J Colo Dent Assoc; 1991 Jul; 70(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 1885784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants. 1. A modified imaging technique.
    Poon CK; Barss TK; Murdoch-Kinch CA; Bricker SL; Miles DA; Van Dis ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 1398842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A transymphyseal X-ray projection to assess the anterior edentulous mandible prior to implant placement.
    Shelley A; Horner K
    Dent Update; 2008 Dec; 35(10):689-94. PubMed ID: 19192691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Area-dependent enlargement ratios of panoramic tomography on orthograde patient positioning and its significance for implant dentistry.
    Gomez-Roman G; Lukas D; Beniashvili R; Schulte W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 10212542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A; Pai KM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
    Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment.
    Dula K; Mini R; Lambrecht JT; van der Stelt PF; Schneeberger P; Clemens G; Sanderink H; Buser D
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Apr; 105(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 9151064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cephalometric tomographic technique to visualize the buccolingual and vertical dimensions of the mandible.
    Fernandes RJ; Azarbal M; Ismail YH; Curtin HD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Oct; 58(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 3478479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology.
    Tyndall DA; Brooks SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 May; 89(5):630-7. PubMed ID: 10807723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of objective plane angulation on the mandibular image using cross-sectional tomography.
    Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Kubota Y; Okumura S; Hayashi H; Ariji E
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 16836175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
    Weingart D; Düker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
    Peltola JS; Mattila M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
    Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic evaluation of implant-obscured bone. Comparison of digitally subtracted tomographic and periapical techniques.
    Ludlow JB; Gates W; Nason R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 7489280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.