182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22349127)
1. Comparison of 3D conformal breast radiation treatment plans using the anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm.
Yoo S; Wu Q; O'Daniel J; Horton J; Yin FF
Radiother Oncol; 2012 May; 103(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22349127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical anisotropic algorithm versus pencil beam convolution for treatment planning of breast cancer: implications for target coverage and radiation burden of normal tissue.
Flejmer AM; Dohlmar F; Nilsson M; Stenmarker M; Dasu A
Anticancer Res; 2015 May; 35(5):2841-8. PubMed ID: 25964565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical implications of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for IMRT treatment planning and verification.
Bragg CM; Wingate K; Conway J
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 18249453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implications of different calculation algorithms in breast radiotherapy: a comparison between pencil beam and collapsed cone convolution.
Cilla S; Digesù C; Macchia G; Deodato F; Sallustio G; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 24491400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for Stage I/II breast carcinoma: initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 0319.
Vicini F; Winter K; Straube W; Wong J; Pass H; Rabinovitch R; Chafe S; Arthur D; Petersen I; McCormick B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Dec; 63(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 16198508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions.
Ojala JJ; Kapanen MK; Hyödynmaa SJ; Wigren TK; Pitkänen MA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4662. PubMed ID: 24710454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The implementation of an advanced treatment planning algorithm in the treatment of lung cancer with conventional radiotherapy.
Pearson M; Atherton P; McMenemin R; McDonald F; Mazdai G; Mulvenna P; Lambert G
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Apr; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 19162457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans.
Basran PS; Zavgorodni S; Berrang T; Olivotto IA; Beckham W
Radiat Oncol; 2010 Dec; 5():120. PubMed ID: 21162739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Varian's AAA algorithm with focus on lung treatments.
Rønde HS; Hoffmann L
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 18803058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.
Hong L; Alektiar KM; Hunt M; Venkatraman E; Leibel SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 15183478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric evaluation of conventional radiotherapy, 3-D conformal radiotherapy and direct machine parameter optimisation intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer after conservative surgery.
Zhang F; Zheng M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 22141607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of conventional and forward-planned intensity-modulated techniques for comprehensive locoregional irradiation of post-mastectomy left breast cancers.
Cavey ML; Bayouth JE; Endres EJ; Pena JM; Colman M; Hatch S
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 15922178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
