122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22349265)
1. Quantitative CT: technique dependence of volume estimation on pulmonary nodules.
Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Colsher J; Amurao M; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1335-48. PubMed ID: 22349265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume.
Gavrielides MA; Zeng R; Myers KJ; Sahiner B; Petrick N
Acad Radiol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 23085408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional analysis of pulmonary nodules by MSCT with Advanced Lung Analysis (ALA1) software.
Volterrani L; Mazzei MA; Scialpi M; Carcano M; Carbone SF; Ricci V; Guazzi G; Lupattelli L
Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16683082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical analysis of lung nodule volume measurements with CT in a large-scale phantom study.
Li Q; Gavrielides MA; Sahiner B; Myers KJ; Zeng R; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3932-47. PubMed ID: 26133594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.
Petrou M; Quint LE; Nan B; Baker LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 17242235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters.
Willemink MJ; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Kort FP; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; de Jong PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 23169714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT.
Robins M; Solomon J; Sahbaee P; Sedlmair M; Roy Choudhury K; Pezeshk A; Sahiner B; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(18):7280-7299. PubMed ID: 28786399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small irregular pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: observer detection sensitivity and volumetry accuracy.
Xie X; Willemink MJ; de Jong PA; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Greuter MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W202-9. PubMed ID: 24555615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of flat-panel-detector-based CT and multidetector-row CT in automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules using an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
Marten K; Dullin C; Machann W; Schmid JS; DAS M; Hermann KP; Engelke C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):716-23. PubMed ID: 19332516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements--a phantom study.
Ravenel JG; Leue WM; Nietert PJ; Miller JV; Taylor KK; Silvestri GA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):400-8. PubMed ID: 18430874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography quantitative analysis of components: a new method monitoring the growth of pulmonary nodule.
Linning E; Wu S; Wang K; Meng H; Sun D; Wu Z
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):904-8. PubMed ID: 23761548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information-theoretic approach for analyzing bias and variance in lung nodule size estimation with CT: a phantom study.
Gavrielides MA; Zeng R; Kinnard LM; Myers KJ; Petrick N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1795-807. PubMed ID: 20562039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of CT Scan Parameters on the Measurement of CT Radiomic Features: A Lung Nodule Phantom Study.
Kim YJ; Lee HJ; Kim KG; Lee SH
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():8790694. PubMed ID: 30881480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images.
Petrick N; Kim HJ; Clunie D; Borradaile K; Ford R; Zeng R; Gavrielides MA; McNitt-Gray MF; Lu ZQ; Fenimore C; Zhao B; Buckler AJ
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24331262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated volumetry of solid pulmonary nodules in a phantom: accuracy across different CT scanner technologies.
Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Katoh M; Bakai A; Salganicoff M; Stanzel S; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Wildberger JE
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17414525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three software systems for semi-automatic volumetry of pulmonary nodules on baseline and follow-up CT examinations.
Zhao YR; van Ooijen PM; Dorrius MD; Heuvelmans M; de Bock GH; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 24132766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules on multidetector CT: influence of slice thickness, reconstruction algorithm and tube current. Preliminary results.
Larici AR; Storto ML; Torge M; Mereu M; Molinari F; Maggi F; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 2008 Feb; 113(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 18338125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study.
Kim H; Park CM; Song YS; Lee SM; Goo JM
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 24572380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A resource for the assessment of lung nodule size estimation methods: database of thoracic CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom.
Gavrielides MA; Kinnard LM; Myers KJ; Peregoy J; Pritchard WF; Zeng R; Esparza J; Karanian J; Petrick N
Opt Express; 2010 Jul; 18(14):15244-55. PubMed ID: 20640011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
