208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22349480)
1. [Triage systems in the emergency department].
Weyrich P; Christ M; Celebi N; Riessen R
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2012 Feb; 107(1):67-78; quiz 79. PubMed ID: 22349480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of the Manchester triage system in older emergency department patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Brouns SHA; Mignot-Evers L; Derkx F; Lambooij SL; Dieleman JP; Haak HR
BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 30612552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modern triage in the emergency department.
Christ M; Grossmann F; Winter D; Bingisser R; Platz E
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 Dec; 107(50):892-8. PubMed ID: 21246025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triage System in emergency departments.
Ng CJ; Hsu KH; Kuan JT; Chiu TF; Chen WK; Lin HJ; Bullard MJ; Chen JC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2010 Nov; 109(11):828-37. PubMed ID: 21126655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in elderly patients: A cohort study.
Kuriyama A; Kaihara T; Ikegami T
Am J Emerg Med; 2019 Dec; 37(12):2159-2164. PubMed ID: 30876775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.
Green NA; Durani Y; Brecher D; DePiero A; Loiselle J; Attia M
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Aug; 28(8):753-7. PubMed ID: 22858740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Review of the Roles and Implementation of Pediatric Emergency Triage Systems in China and Other Countries.
Zhao J; He L; Zhao Y; Hu J
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Dec; 29():e941582. PubMed ID: 38050350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting admission and mortality with the Emergency Severity Index and the Manchester Triage System: a retrospective observational study.
van der Wulp I; Schrijvers AJ; van Stel HF
Emerg Med J; 2009 Jul; 26(7):506-9. PubMed ID: 19546272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool.
Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Akhmetshin E; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17200513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance characteristics of a local triage tool and internationally validated tools among under-fives presenting to an urban emergency department in Tanzania.
Marombwa NR; Sawe HR; George U; Kilindimo SS; Lucumay NJ; Mjema KM; Mfinanga JA; Weber EJ
BMC Pediatr; 2019 Feb; 19(1):44. PubMed ID: 30709389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Emergency Severity Index (version 3) 5-level triage system scores predict ED resource consumption.
Tanabe P; Gimbel R; Yarnold PR; Adams JG
J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Feb; 30(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 14765078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.
Elkum NB; Barrett C; Al-Omran H
BMC Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 11():3. PubMed ID: 21310024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The presentational flow chart "unwell adult" of the Manchester Triage System-Curse or blessing?
Brutschin V; Kogej M; Schacher S; Berger M; Gräff I
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252730. PubMed ID: 34081753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the Emergency Severity Index.
Baumann MR; Strout TD
Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Feb; 49(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 17141145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric emergency triage systems.
Simon Junior H; Schvartsman C; Sukys GA; Farhat SCL
Rev Paul Pediatr; 2022; 41():e2021038. PubMed ID: 35858040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Manchester Triage System in Adult Medical Emergency Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Steiner D; Renetseder F; Kutz A; Haubitz S; Faessler L; Anderson JB; Laukemann S; Rast AC; Felder S; Conca A; Reutlinger B; Batschwaroff M; Tobias P; Buergi U; Mueller B; Schuetz P
J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):678-89. PubMed ID: 26458788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Triage in emergency departments. Comparative evaluation of 4 international triage systems].
Krey J
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2016 Mar; 111(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 26362190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing the Usability of the 5-Level Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale By Paramedics in the Prehospital Environment.
Smith DT; Snyder A; Hollen PJ; Anderson JG; Caterino JM
J Emerg Nurs; 2015 Nov; 41(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 26001701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive validity comparison of two five-level triage acuity scales.
Worster A; Fernandes CM; Eva K; Upadhye S
Eur J Emerg Med; 2007 Aug; 14(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 17620907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effects of Displaying the Time Targets of the Manchester Triage System to Emergency Department Personnel: Prospective Crossover Study.
Bienzeisler J; Becker G; Erdmann B; Kombeiz A; Majeed RW; Röhrig R; Greiner F; Otto R; Otto-Sobotka F;
J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e45593. PubMed ID: 38743464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
