These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2235106)

  • 1. Reaction time task as unconditional stimulus. Comparing aversive and nonaversive unconditional stimuli.
    Lipp OV; Vaitl D
    Pavlov J Biol Sci; 1990; 25(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 2235106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction time task as unconditional stimulus. On conditioning skin conductance responses and heart rate, using a nonaversive unconditional stimulus.
    Lipp OV; Vaitl D
    Pavlov J Biol Sci; 1988; 23(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 3231496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of an unpleasant sound unconditional stimulus in an aversive conditioning procedure with 8- to 11-year-old children.
    Neumann DL; Waters AM; Westbury HR; Henry J
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Dec; 79(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 18822341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrodermal Pavlovian conditioning with prepared and unprepared stimuli.
    Kirsch P; Boucsein W
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1994; 29(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 7947328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of an unpleasant sound as an unconditional stimulus in a human aversive Pavlovian conditioning procedure.
    Neumann DL; Waters AM
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 16698165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classical conditioning and information processing: different mechanism for prepared and unprepared stimuli?
    Kirsch P; Boucsein W
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1997; 32(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 9322114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditional stimulus choices affect fear learning: Comparing fear conditioning with neutral faces and shapes or angry faces.
    Ney LJ; Luck CC; Waters AM; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Oct; 59(10):e14068. PubMed ID: 35477888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human blink startle during aversive and nonaversive Pavlovian conditioning.
    Lipp OV; Sheridan J; Siddle DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Oct; 20(4):380-9. PubMed ID: 7964520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of conditioned stimulus pre-exposure on human electrodermal conditioning to fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli.
    Björkstrand PA
    Biol Psychol; 1990 Feb; 30(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 2223935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of cross unconditional stimulus reinstatement on electrodermal responding and conditional stimulus valence in differential fear conditioning.
    Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14278. PubMed ID: 36929597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Allocation of cognitive processing capacity during human autonomic classical conditioning.
    Dawson ME; Schell AM; Beers JR; Kelly A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Sep; 111(3):273-95. PubMed ID: 6215459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention avoidance of the threat conditioned stimulus during extinction increases physiological arousal generalisation and retention.
    O'Malley KR; Waters AM
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 May; 104():51-61. PubMed ID: 29549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26032171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internal consistency and temporal stability of classically conditioned skin conductance responses.
    Fredrikson M; Annas P; Georgiades A; Hursti T; Tersman Z
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr; 35(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 8507744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direction of attention bias to threat relates to differences in fear acquisition and extinction in anxious children.
    Waters AM; Kershaw R
    Behav Res Ther; 2015 Jan; 64():56-65. PubMed ID: 25540863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When orienting and anticipation dissociate--a case for scoring electrodermal responses in multiple latency windows in studies of human fear conditioning.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Feb; 100():36-43. PubMed ID: 26688271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classical conditioning and attentional bias.
    Merckelbach H; van Hout W; de Jong P; van den Hout MA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 21(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 2086603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appetitive and aversive classical conditioning of female sexual response.
    Both S; Laan E; Spiering M; Nilsson T; Oomens S; Everaerd W
    J Sex Med; 2008 Jun; 5(6):1386-401. PubMed ID: 18373525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aversive Pavlovian conditioning in childhood anxiety disorders: impaired response inhibition and resistance to extinction.
    Waters AM; Henry J; Neumann DL
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2009 May; 118(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 19413406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodermal activity as an indicator of information processing in a nonaversive differential classical conditioning paradigm.
    Kirsch P; Boucsein W; Baltissen R
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1993; 28(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 8318440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.