These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22351589)
1. Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology. Francis G Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22351589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Francis G Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology. Etz A; Vandekerckhove J PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Psychology of Replication and Replication in Psychology. Francis G Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):585-94. PubMed ID: 26168115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science. Francis G Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Oct; 21(5):1180-7. PubMed ID: 24638826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Addressing publication bias with model-averaging. Maier M; Bartoš F; Wagenmakers EJ Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):107-122. PubMed ID: 35588075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study. van Aert RC; van Assen MA PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175302. PubMed ID: 28388646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the change in meta-analytic effect size estimates after the application of publication bias adjustment methods. Sladekova M; Webb LEA; Field AP Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):664-686. PubMed ID: 35446048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success. Kunert R Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias. Guan M; Vandekerckhove J Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 26126776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Model-averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods. Bartoš F; Maier M; Wagenmakers EJ; Doucouliagos H; Stanley TD Res Synth Methods; 2023 Jan; 14(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 35869696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An automatic testing and recording device for experiments in extrasensory perception. WEBSTER DD J Parapsychol; 1949 Jun; 13(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 18150786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian data analysis as a tool for behavior analysts. Young ME J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):225-238. PubMed ID: 30779356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Bishop DV Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jan; 73(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 31724919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size. Kühberger A; Fritz A; Scherndl T PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e105825. PubMed ID: 25192357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Du H; Liu F; Wang L Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). Wagenmakers EJ; Wetzels R; Borsboom D; van der Maas HL J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Mar; 100(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 21280965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of "Too Good to Be True" for Replication, Theoretical Claims, and Experimental Design: An Example Using Prominent Studies of Racial Bias. Francis G Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1382. PubMed ID: 27713708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature. Kagereki E; Gakonyo J; Simila H BMC Oral Health; 2016 May; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 27150796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reform of statistical inference in psychology: the case of memory & cognition. Finch S; Cumming G; Williams J; Palmer L; Griffith E; Alders C; Anderson J; Goodman O Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 15354697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]