These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352169)

  • 1. Estimating thresholds in occupancy when species detection is imperfect.
    Jones JE; Kroll AJ; Giovanini J; Duke SD; Betts MG
    Ecology; 2011 Dec; 92(12):2299-309. PubMed ID: 22352169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ignoring imperfect detection in biological surveys is dangerous: a response to 'fitting and interpreting occupancy models'.
    Guillera-Arroita G; Lahoz-Monfort JJ; MacKenzie DI; Wintle BA; McCarthy MA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e99571. PubMed ID: 25075615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comment on priors for Bayesian occupancy models.
    Northrup JM; Gerber BD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192819. PubMed ID: 29481554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Site occupancy models with heterogeneous detection probabilities.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 16542234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating indices of range shifts in birds using dynamic models when detection is imperfect.
    Clement MJ; Hines JE; Nichols JD; Pardieck KL; Ziolkowski DJ
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Oct; 22(10):3273-85. PubMed ID: 26990459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian change-point analyses in ecology.
    Beckage B; Joseph L; Belisle P; Wolfson DB; Platt WJ
    New Phytol; 2007; 174(2):456-467. PubMed ID: 17388908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling.
    Conroy MJ; Runge JP; Barker RJ; Schofield MR; Fonnesbeck CJ
    Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3362-70. PubMed ID: 19137943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impacts of imperfect detection on estimates of diversity and community structure through multispecies occupancy modeling.
    Benoit D; Jackson DA; Ridgway MS
    Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(9):4676-4684. PubMed ID: 29760907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting and interpreting occupancy models.
    Welsh AH; Lindenmayer DB; Donnelly CF
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52015. PubMed ID: 23326323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models.
    Royle JA; Kéry M
    Ecology; 2007 Jul; 88(7):1813-23. PubMed ID: 17645027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the predictive abilities of community occupancy models using AUC while accounting for imperfect detection.
    Zipkin EF; Grant EH; Fagan WF
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Oct; 22(7):1962-72. PubMed ID: 23210312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized model-based solutions to false-positive error in species detection/nondetection data.
    Clare JDJ; Townsend PA; Zuckerberg B
    Ecology; 2021 Feb; 102(2):e03241. PubMed ID: 33190269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of classical bird census transects as spatial replicates for hierarchical modeling of an avian community.
    Jiménez-Franco MV; Kéry M; León-Ortega M; Robledano F; Esteve MA; Calvo JF
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(2):825-835. PubMed ID: 30766672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupancy modeling species-environment relationships with non-ignorable survey designs.
    Irvine KM; Rodhouse TJ; Wright WJ; Olsen AR
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 29802750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Site-occupancy distribution modeling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations.
    Kéry M; Royle JA; Schmid H; Schaub M; Volet B; Häfliger G; Zbinden N
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1388-97. PubMed ID: 20337672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint species distribution models with imperfect detection for high-dimensional spatial data.
    Doser JW; Finley AO; Banerjee S
    Ecology; 2023 Sep; 104(9):e4137. PubMed ID: 37424187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of accounting for imperfect detection when estimating functional and phylogenetic community structure.
    Si X; Cadotte MW; Zhao Y; Zhou H; Zeng D; Li J; Jin T; Ren P; Wang Y; Ding P; Tingley MW
    Ecology; 2018 Sep; 99(9):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 29944742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys while accommodating detection covariance.
    Clare J; McKinney ST; DePue JE; Loftin CS
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):2031-2047. PubMed ID: 28644579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic N-occupancy models: estimating demographic rates and local abundance from detection-nondetection data.
    Rossman S; Yackulic CB; Saunders SP; Reid J; Davis R; Zipkin EF
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3300-3307. PubMed ID: 27912019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling abundance using N-mixture models: the importance of considering ecological mechanisms.
    Joseph LN; Elkin C; Martin TG; Possinghami HP
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Apr; 19(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 19425427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.