147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352312)
1. Potential restrictions for CO2 sequestration sites due to shale and tight gas production.
Elliot TR; Celia MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(7):4223-7. PubMed ID: 22352312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating the carbon sequestration capacity of shale formations using methane production rates.
Tao Z; Clarens A
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(19):11318-25. PubMed ID: 23988277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications.
Weber CL; Clavin C
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):5688-95. PubMed ID: 22545623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle water consumption for shale gas and conventional natural gas.
Clark CE; Horner RM; Harto CB
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(20):11829-36. PubMed ID: 24004382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Case study on combined CO₂ sequestration and low-salinity water production potential in a shallow saline aquifer in Qatar.
Ahmed TK; Nasrabadi H
J Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 109():27-32. PubMed ID: 22672956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis.
Keating GN; Middleton RS; Stauffer PH; Viswanathan HS; Letellier BC; Pasqualini D; Pawar RJ; Wolfsberg AV
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 20698546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.
Burnham A; Han J; Clark CE; Wang M; Dunn JB; Palou-Rivera I
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):619-27. PubMed ID: 22107036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CO2 hydrates could provide secondary safety factor in subsurface sequestration of CO2.
Tohidi B; Yang J; Salehabadi M; Anderson R; Chapoy A
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(4):1509-14. PubMed ID: 20085250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CO2 mineral sequestration in oil-shale wastes from Estonian power production.
Uibu M; Uus M; Kuusik R
J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):1253-60. PubMed ID: 18793821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Water challenges for geologic carbon capture and sequestration.
Newmark RL; Friedmann SJ; Carroll SA
Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):651-61. PubMed ID: 20127328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ozone impacts of natural gas development in the Haynesville Shale.
Kemball-Cook S; Bar-Ilan A; Grant J; Parker L; Jung J; Santamaria W; Mathews J; Yarwood G
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9357-63. PubMed ID: 21086985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making carbon sequestration a paying proposition.
Han FX; Lindner JS; Wang C
Naturwissenschaften; 2007 Mar; 94(3):170-82. PubMed ID: 17103136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale to aquifers.
Myers T
Ground Water; 2012; 50(6):872-82. PubMed ID: 22509908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehensive review of caprock-sealing mechanisms for geologic carbon sequestration.
Song J; Zhang D
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 23020638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential impacts of leakage from deep CO2 geosequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers.
Little MG; Jackson RB
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):9225-32. PubMed ID: 20977267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geochemical impacts to groundwater from geologic carbon sequestration: controls on pH and inorganic carbon concentrations from reaction path and kinetic modeling.
Wilkin RT; Digiulio DC
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(12):4821-7. PubMed ID: 20469895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
