These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352476)

  • 1. Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1011-4. PubMed ID: 22352476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
    Hazan V; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying prosodic contrasts in utterances produced by 4-, 7-, and 11-year-old children.
    Patel R; Brayton JT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):790-801. PubMed ID: 18978213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaction of audition and vision for the perception of prosodic contrastive focus.
    Dohen M; Loevenbruck H
    Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):177-206. PubMed ID: 19624029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2998-10. PubMed ID: 21110595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
    Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages.
    Swerts M; Hirschberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1337-45. PubMed ID: 20815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic and perceptual cues for compound-phrasal contrasts in Vietnamese.
    Nguyen AT; Ingram JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1746. PubMed ID: 17927434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local and Global Cues in the Prosodic Realization of Broad and Narrow Focus in Bulgarian.
    Andreeva B; Barry WJ; Koreman J
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(3-4):256-278. PubMed ID: 28208148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-line processing of "pop-out" words in spoken French dialogues.
    Magne C; Astésano C; Lacheret-Dujour A; Morel M; Alter K; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):740-56. PubMed ID: 15904541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerebral laterality for phonemic and prosodic cue decoding in children with autism.
    Minagawa-Kawai Y; Naoi N; Kikuchi N; Yamamoto J; Nakamura K; Kojima S
    Neuroreport; 2009 Aug; 20(13):1219-24. PubMed ID: 19617855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic information.
    Nakai S; Turk AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):966-76. PubMed ID: 21361453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case of impaired auditory and visual speech prosody perception after right hemisphere damage.
    Nicholson KG; Baum S; Cuddy LL; Munhall KG
    Neurocase; 2002; 8(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12221144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.