These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352515)

  • 1. Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences.
    Kidd GR; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1434-48. PubMed ID: 22352515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
    Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
    Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations on Recognition Performance by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; Sharrett KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 28054913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Context and Hearing Loss on Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children.
    Lewis D; Kopun J; McCreery R; Brennan M; Nishi K; Cordrey E; Stelmachowicz P; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):e180-e192. PubMed ID: 28045838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition Performance of Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations.
    Wilson RH; Hamm HM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 26218055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):884-97. PubMed ID: 25698021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.
    Woodfield A; Akeroyd MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL26-31. PubMed ID: 20649185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of hearing and aging on sentence-level time-gated word recognition.
    Molis MR; Kampel SD; McMillan GP; Gallun FJ; Dann SM; Konrad-Martin D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):481-96. PubMed ID: 25815688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.