BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352517)

  • 1. The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.
    Winn MB; Chatterjee M; Idsardi WJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1465-79. PubMed ID: 22352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical bias in word recognition by cochlear implant listeners.
    Gianakas SP; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3373. PubMed ID: 31795696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.
    Kong YY; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):959-80. PubMed ID: 21060139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.
    Peng SC; Lu N; Chatterjee M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users.
    Teoh SW; Neuburger HS; Svirsky MA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(5):269-85. PubMed ID: 12904682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.
    Smith ML; Winn MB
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 33795617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shifting Perceptual Weights in L2 Vowel Identification after Training.
    Hu W; Mi L; Yang Z; Tao S; Li M; Wang W; Dong Q; Liu C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162876. PubMed ID: 27649413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.