These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352517)

  • 21. Reducing Simulated Channel Interaction Reveals Differences in Phoneme Identification Between Children and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Jahn KN; DiNino M; Arenberg JG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):295-311. PubMed ID: 29927780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
    Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Feng L; Oxenham AJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):990-997. PubMed ID: 31815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of deafness on acoustic characteristics of American English tense/lax vowels in maternal speech to infants.
    Kondaurova MV; Bergeson TR; Dilley LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1039-49. PubMed ID: 22894224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Johnson LB; Oh SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 26233007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vowel Production in Prelingually Deafened Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Yang J; Xu L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):664-682. PubMed ID: 33524265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of spectral resolution on spectral contrast effects in cochlear-implant users.
    Feng L; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL468. PubMed ID: 29960500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.
    van de Ven M; Ernestus M
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):358-383. PubMed ID: 28870139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Tarr E; Caldwell-Tarr A; Welling DB; Shahin AJ; Nittrouer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):566-82. PubMed ID: 24686722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.
    Fleming JT; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1300. PubMed ID: 36182279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters.
    Stevens KN; Blumstein SE; Glicksman L; Burton M; Kurowski K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2979-3000. PubMed ID: 1629490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.
    Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3972-88. PubMed ID: 19206821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners.
    Kondaurova MV; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3959. PubMed ID: 19206820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.