These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22352523)

  • 1. Classification of stop place in consonant-vowel contexts using feature extrapolation of acoustic-phonetic features in telephone speech.
    Lee JW; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1536-46. PubMed ID: 22352523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of acoustic parameters for consonant voicing classification in clean and telephone speech.
    Lee SM; Choi JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL197-202. PubMed ID: 22423808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A probabilistic framework for landmark detection based on phonetic features for automatic speech recognition.
    Juneja A; Espy-Wilson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1154-68. PubMed ID: 18247915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis and prediction of acoustic speech features from mel-frequency cepstral coefficients in distributed speech recognition architectures.
    Darch J; Milner B; Vaseghi S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3989-4000. PubMed ID: 19206822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cues to perception of reduced flaps.
    Warner N; Fountain A; Tucker BV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3317-27. PubMed ID: 19425673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some effects of acoustic attributes of speech on the processing of phonetic feature information.
    Soli SD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 6449534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.
    Gordon PC; Eberhardt JL; Rueckl JG
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 8425384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Static features in real-time recognition of isolated vowels at high pitch.
    Ferreira AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2389-404. PubMed ID: 17902873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-model based robust feature selection for speech recognition.
    Koniaris C; Kuropatwinski M; Kleijn WB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):EL73-9. PubMed ID: 20136182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
    Meyer BT; Jürgens T; Wesker T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectro-temporal modulation subspace-spanning filter bank features for robust automatic speech recognition.
    Schädler M; Meyer BT; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4134-51. PubMed ID: 22559385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the temporal dynamics of distinctive feature landmark detectors for speech recognition.
    Jansen A; Niyogi P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1739-58. PubMed ID: 19045664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Ochoa F; Enzinger E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL54-60. PubMed ID: 23298018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic hole filling for sparse enrollment data using a cohort universal corpus for speaker recognition.
    Suh JW; Hansen JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1515-28. PubMed ID: 22352521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation frequency features for phoneme recognition in noisy speech.
    Ganapathy S; Thomas S; Hermansky H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):EL8-12. PubMed ID: 19173383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.